Demographics details for Medford, MA vs Bell gardens, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Medford, MA vs Bell gardens, CA.

Data Medford Bell gardens
Population 65,399 37,927
Median Age 35.4 years 31.1 years
Median Income $114,863 $53,935
Married Families 34.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 7% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.6 6.7

Population Comparison: Medford vs Bell gardens

  • In Medford, the population is higher at 65,399, compared to 37,927 in Bell gardens.
  • Residents in Medford have a higher median age of 35.4 years compared to 31.1 years in Bell gardens.
  • Medford has a higher median income of $114,863 compared to $53,935 in Bell gardens.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Medford at 34.0% compared to 27.0% in Bell gardens.
  • The poverty level is higher in Bell gardens at 15%, compared to 7% in Medford.
  • Bell gardens has a higher unemployment rate at 6.7% compared to 3.6% in Medford.

Demographics

Demographics Medford vs Bell gardens provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Medford Bell gardens
Black 7 1
White 67 -35
Asian 11 Data is updating
Hispanic 8 99
Two or More Races 7 34
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Medford vs Bell gardens

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Medford at 7% compared to 1% in Bell gardens.
  • Medford has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to -35% in Bell gardens.
  • The Asian population is larger in Medford at 11% compared to 0% in Bell gardens.
  • Bell gardens has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 99%, compared to 8% in Medford.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bell gardens at 34%, compared to 7% in Medford.
  • In Bell gardens, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Medford.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Medford Bell gardens
Mental Health Not Good 14.3% 18.9%
Physical Health Not Good 8.7% 17.9%
Depression 21.1% 17.5%
Smoking 10.6% 16.2%
Binge Drinking 18.7% 13.3%
Obesity 25.1% 37.2%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Medford vs Bell gardens

  • In Bell gardens, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 14.3% in Medford.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Medford at 21.1% compared to 17.5% in Bell gardens.
  • Bell gardens has a higher smoking rate at 16.2% compared to 10.6% in Medford.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Medford at 18.7% compared to 13.3% in Bell gardens.
  • Bell gardens has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 25.1% in Medford.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Medford and Bell gardens at 7.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Medford Bell gardens
No Schooling 0.6% (406) 4.5% (1,722)
High School Diploma 12.5% (8,155) 16.9% (6,418)
Less than High School 7.9% (5,192) 60.8% (23,053)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 38.9% (25,424) 3.9% (1,476)

Education Levels Comparison: Medford vs Bell gardens

  • In Bell gardens, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 0.6% in Medford.
  • In Bell gardens, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 12.5% in Medford.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bell gardens at 60.8%, compared to 7.9% in Medford.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Medford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 3.9% in Bell gardens.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.