Demographics details for Mechanicsburg, PA vs Chickasha, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mechanicsburg, PA vs Chickasha, OK.

Data Mechanicsburg Chickasha
Population 9,634 16,549
Median Age 38.4 years 36.4 years
Median Income $75,806 $55,136
Married Families 36.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 5% 17%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Mechanicsburg vs Chickasha

  • The population in Chickasha is higher at 16,549, compared to 9,634 in Mechanicsburg.
  • Residents in Mechanicsburg have a higher median age of 38.4 years compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
  • Mechanicsburg has a higher median income of $75,806 compared to $55,136 in Chickasha.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Mechanicsburg at 36.0% compared to 34.0% in Chickasha.
  • The poverty level is higher in Chickasha at 17%, compared to 5% in Mechanicsburg.
  • The unemployment rate in Mechanicsburg is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.

Demographics

Demographics Mechanicsburg vs Chickasha provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mechanicsburg Chickasha
Black 2 6
White 84 71
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 6 8
Two or More Races 7 11
American Indian Data is updating 4

Demographics Comparison: Mechanicsburg vs Chickasha

  • In Chickasha, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 2% in Mechanicsburg.
  • Mechanicsburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 71% in Chickasha.
  • The Asian population is larger in Mechanicsburg at 1% compared to 0% in Chickasha.
  • Chickasha has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 6% in Mechanicsburg.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chickasha at 11%, compared to 7% in Mechanicsburg.
  • In Chickasha, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Mechanicsburg.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mechanicsburg Chickasha
Mental Health Not Good 15.3% 19.1%
Physical Health Not Good 10.2% 13.7%
Depression 21.8% 25.4%
Smoking 15.7% 21.8%
Binge Drinking 17.8% 13.8%
Obesity 31.2% 40.8%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mechanicsburg vs Chickasha

  • In Chickasha, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.3% in Mechanicsburg.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Chickasha at 25.4% versus 21.8% in Mechanicsburg.
  • Chickasha has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 15.7% in Mechanicsburg.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Mechanicsburg at 17.8% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
  • Chickasha has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 31.2% in Mechanicsburg.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chickasha at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Mechanicsburg.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mechanicsburg Chickasha
No Schooling 0.1% (13) 0.5% (78)
High School Diploma 21.7% (2,086) 22.5% (3,730)
Less than High School 5.7% (550) 13.1% (2,160)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 30.4% (2,931) 12.5% (2,066)

Education Levels Comparison: Mechanicsburg vs Chickasha

  • In Chickasha, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.1% in Mechanicsburg.
  • In Chickasha, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.5% compared to 21.7% in Mechanicsburg.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chickasha at 13.1%, compared to 5.7% in Mechanicsburg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mechanicsburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 12.5% in Chickasha.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.