Demographics details for Meadville, PA vs Shreveport, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Meadville, PA vs Shreveport, LA.
| Data | Meadville | Shreveport |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,680 | 180,153 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $46,157 | $45,967 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Meadville vs Shreveport
- The population in Shreveport is higher at 180,153, compared to 12,680 in Meadville.
- The median age in Shreveport is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 35.7 years in Meadville.
- Meadville has a higher median income of $46,157 compared to $45,967 in Shreveport.
- In Shreveport, the percentage of married families is higher at 29.0%, compared to 27.0% in Meadville.
- The poverty level is higher in Shreveport at 21%, compared to 12% in Meadville.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Meadville and Shreveport at 5.0%.
Demographics
Demographics Meadville vs Shreveport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Meadville | Shreveport |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 58 |
| White | 86 | 33 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Meadville vs Shreveport
- In Shreveport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 58% compared to 5% in Meadville.
- Meadville has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 33% in Shreveport.
- In Shreveport, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Meadville.
- Shreveport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Meadville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Meadville at 6% compared to 4% in Shreveport.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Meadville and Shreveport at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Meadville | Shreveport |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 24.2% | 24.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 41.5% | 42.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Meadville vs Shreveport
- In Shreveport, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 19.2% in Meadville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Meadville at 26.6% compared to 24.4% in Shreveport.
- Shreveport has a higher smoking rate at 24.3% compared to 24.2% in Meadville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Meadville at 16.6% compared to 16.2% in Shreveport.
- Shreveport has higher obesity rates at 42.5% compared to 41.5% in Meadville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Meadville at 21.0% compared to 16.0% in Shreveport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Meadville | Shreveport |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (29) | 1.2% (2,087) |
| High School Diploma | 24.5% (3,110) | 18.3% (33,032) |
| Less than High School | 8.6% (1,085) | 11.1% (20,070) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.4% (1,953) | 18.6% (33,461) |
Education Levels Comparison: Meadville vs Shreveport
- In Shreveport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.2% in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Meadville hold a high school diploma at 24.5% compared to 18.3% in Shreveport.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shreveport at 11.1%, compared to 8.6% in Meadville.
- In Shreveport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 15.4% in Meadville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.