Demographics details for Meadville, PA vs Shiloh, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Meadville, PA vs Shiloh, TN.
| Data | Meadville | Shiloh |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,680 | 163 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 38.0 years |
| Median Income | $46,157 | $52,900 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Meadville vs Shiloh
- In Meadville, the population is higher at 12,680, compared to 163 in Shiloh.
- The median age in Shiloh is higher at 38.0 years, compared to 35.7 years in Meadville.
- Shiloh has a higher median income of $52,900, compared to $46,157 in Meadville.
- In Shiloh, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 27.0% in Meadville.
- Meadville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Shiloh.
- The unemployment rate in Meadville is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.2% in Shiloh.
Demographics
Demographics Meadville vs Shiloh provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Meadville | Shiloh |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 5 |
| White | 86 | 90 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Meadville vs Shiloh
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Meadville and Shiloh at 5%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Shiloh at 90% compared to 86% in Meadville.
- The Asian population is larger in Meadville at 1% compared to 0% in Shiloh.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Meadville and Shiloh at 2%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Meadville at 6% compared to 3% in Shiloh.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Meadville and Shiloh at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Meadville | Shiloh |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 26.6% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 24.2% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 41.5% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Meadville vs Shiloh
- More residents in Meadville report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 0.0% in Shiloh.
- Depression is more prevalent in Meadville at 26.6% compared to 0.0% in Shiloh.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Meadville at 24.2% compared to 0.0% in Shiloh.
- Binge drinking is more common in Meadville at 16.6% compared to 0.0% in Shiloh.
- Obesity rates are higher in Meadville at 41.5% compared to 0.0% in Shiloh.
- Disability percentages are higher in Meadville at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Shiloh.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Meadville | Shiloh |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (29) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 24.5% (3,110) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 8.6% (1,085) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.4% (1,953) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Meadville vs Shiloh
- A higher percentage of residents in Meadville have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Shiloh.
- A higher percentage of residents in Meadville hold a high school diploma at 24.5% compared to 0.0% in Shiloh.
- More residents in Meadville have less than a high school education at 8.6% compared to 0.0% in Shiloh.
- A higher percentage of residents in Meadville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.4% compared to 0.0% in Shiloh.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.