Demographics details for Meadville, PA vs Porterville, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Meadville, PA vs Porterville, CA.
Data | Meadville | Porterville |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,680 | 62,998 |
Median Age | 35.7 years | 31.3 years |
Median Income | $46,157 | $55,785 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 23% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 14.6 |
Population Comparison: Meadville vs Porterville
- The population in Porterville is higher at 62,998, compared to 12,680 in Meadville.
- Residents in Meadville have a higher median age of 35.7 years compared to 31.3 years in Porterville.
- Porterville has a higher median income of $55,785, compared to $46,157 in Meadville.
- In Porterville, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 27.0% in Meadville.
- The poverty level is higher in Porterville at 23%, compared to 12% in Meadville.
- Porterville has a higher unemployment rate at 14.6% compared to 5.0% in Meadville.
Demographics
Demographics Meadville vs Porterville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Meadville | Porterville |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 1 |
White | 86 | 1 |
Asian | 1 | 4 |
Hispanic | 2 | 71 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 21 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Meadville vs Porterville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Meadville at 5% compared to 1% in Porterville.
- Meadville has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 1% in Porterville.
- In Porterville, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Meadville.
- Porterville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 71%, compared to 2% in Meadville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Porterville at 21%, compared to 6% in Meadville.
- In Porterville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Meadville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Meadville | Porterville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 19.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 16.1% |
Depression | 26.6% | 20.6% |
Smoking | 24.2% | 17.3% |
Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 14.1% |
Obesity | 41.5% | 36.4% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Meadville vs Porterville
- More residents in Meadville report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 19.1% in Porterville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Meadville at 26.6% compared to 20.6% in Porterville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Meadville at 24.2% compared to 17.3% in Porterville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Meadville at 16.6% compared to 14.1% in Porterville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Meadville at 41.5% compared to 36.4% in Porterville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Meadville at 21.0% compared to 10.0% in Porterville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Meadville | Porterville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (29) | 2.8% (1,751) |
High School Diploma | 24.5% (3,110) | 12.2% (7,695) |
Less than High School | 8.6% (1,085) | 35.0% (22,037) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.4% (1,953) | 8.0% (5,010) |
Education Levels Comparison: Meadville vs Porterville
- In Porterville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.2% in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Meadville hold a high school diploma at 24.5% compared to 12.2% in Porterville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Porterville at 35.0%, compared to 8.6% in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Meadville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.4% compared to 8.0% in Porterville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.