Demographics details for Meadville, PA vs Keyport, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Meadville, PA vs Keyport, WA.
| Data | Meadville | Keyport |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,680 | 284 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 57.0 years |
| Median Income | $46,157 | $128,221 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 58.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Meadville vs Keyport
- In Meadville, the population is higher at 12,680, compared to 284 in Keyport.
- The median age in Keyport is higher at 57.0 years, compared to 35.7 years in Meadville.
- Keyport has a higher median income of $128,221, compared to $46,157 in Meadville.
- In Keyport, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 27.0% in Meadville.
- Meadville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Keyport.
- The unemployment rate in Meadville is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.0% in Keyport.
Demographics
Demographics Meadville vs Keyport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Meadville | Keyport |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | Data is updating |
| White | 86 | 95 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Meadville vs Keyport
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Meadville at 5% compared to 0% in Keyport.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Keyport at 95% compared to 86% in Meadville.
- The Asian population is larger in Meadville at 1% compared to 0% in Keyport.
- Keyport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Meadville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Meadville at 6% compared to 0% in Keyport.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Meadville and Keyport at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Meadville | Keyport |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 26.4% |
| Smoking | 24.2% | 11.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 41.5% | 30.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Meadville vs Keyport
- More residents in Meadville report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 14.9% in Keyport.
- Depression is more prevalent in Meadville at 26.6% compared to 26.4% in Keyport.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Meadville at 24.2% compared to 11.5% in Keyport.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Keyport at 18.9% compared to 16.6% in Meadville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Meadville at 41.5% compared to 30.8% in Keyport.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Keyport at 24.0% compared to 21.0% in Meadville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Meadville | Keyport |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (29) | 6.0% (17) |
| High School Diploma | 24.5% (3,110) | 8.8% (25) |
| Less than High School | 8.6% (1,085) | 12.0% (34) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.4% (1,953) | 37.3% (106) |
Education Levels Comparison: Meadville vs Keyport
- In Keyport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 6.0% compared to 0.2% in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Meadville hold a high school diploma at 24.5% compared to 8.8% in Keyport.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Keyport at 12.0%, compared to 8.6% in Meadville.
- In Keyport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.3% compared to 15.4% in Meadville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.