Demographics details for Meadville, PA vs Harrington park, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Meadville, PA vs Harrington park, NJ.

Data Meadville Harrington park
Population 12,680 4,954
Median Age 35.7 years 46.9 years
Median Income $46,157 $183,138
Married Families 27.0% 57.0%
Poverty Level 12% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 5.0 3.4

Population Comparison: Meadville vs Harrington park

  • In Meadville, the population is higher at 12,680, compared to 4,954 in Harrington park.
  • The median age in Harrington park is higher at 46.9 years, compared to 35.7 years in Meadville.
  • Harrington park has a higher median income of $183,138, compared to $46,157 in Meadville.
  • In Harrington park, the percentage of married families is higher at 57.0%, compared to 27.0% in Meadville.
  • Meadville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Harrington park.
  • The unemployment rate in Meadville is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.4% in Harrington park.

Demographics

Demographics Meadville vs Harrington park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Meadville Harrington park
Black 5 Data is updating
White 86 70
Asian 1 19
Hispanic 2 5
Two or More Races 6 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Meadville vs Harrington park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Meadville at 5% compared to 0% in Harrington park.
  • Meadville has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 70% in Harrington park.
  • In Harrington park, the Asian population stands at 19%, greater than 1% in Meadville.
  • Harrington park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Meadville.
  • Both Meadville and Harrington park have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Meadville and Harrington park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Meadville Harrington park
Mental Health Not Good 19.2% 12.5%
Physical Health Not Good 14.0% 7.0%
Depression 26.6% 16.7%
Smoking 24.2% 9.6%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 17.5%
Obesity 41.5% 23.0%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Meadville vs Harrington park

  • More residents in Meadville report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 12.5% in Harrington park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Meadville at 26.6% compared to 16.7% in Harrington park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Meadville at 24.2% compared to 9.6% in Harrington park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Harrington park at 17.5% compared to 16.6% in Meadville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Meadville at 41.5% compared to 23.0% in Harrington park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Meadville at 21.0% compared to 10.0% in Harrington park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Meadville Harrington park
No Schooling 0.2% (29) 0.2% (10)
High School Diploma 24.5% (3,110) 7.0% (345)
Less than High School 8.6% (1,085) 2.1% (105)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.4% (1,953) 47.3% (2,342)

Education Levels Comparison: Meadville vs Harrington park

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Meadville and Harrington park at 0.2%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Meadville hold a high school diploma at 24.5% compared to 7.0% in Harrington park.
  • More residents in Meadville have less than a high school education at 8.6% compared to 2.1% in Harrington park.
  • In Harrington park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.3% compared to 15.4% in Meadville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.