Demographics details for Meadville, PA vs Grand junction, CO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Meadville, PA vs Grand junction, CO.

Data Meadville Grand junction
Population 12,680 68,034
Median Age 35.7 years 39.9 years
Median Income $46,157 $62,993
Married Families 27.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 12% 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 4.7

Population Comparison: Meadville vs Grand junction

  • The population in Grand junction is higher at 68,034, compared to 12,680 in Meadville.
  • The median age in Grand junction is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 35.7 years in Meadville.
  • Grand junction has a higher median income of $62,993, compared to $46,157 in Meadville.
  • In Grand junction, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 27.0% in Meadville.
  • Meadville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Grand junction.
  • The unemployment rate in Meadville is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.7% in Grand junction.

Demographics

Demographics Meadville vs Grand junction provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Meadville Grand junction
Black 5 1
White 86 73
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 2 16
Two or More Races 6 8
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Meadville vs Grand junction

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Meadville at 5% compared to 1% in Grand junction.
  • Meadville has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 73% in Grand junction.
  • Both Meadville and Grand junction have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Grand junction has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 2% in Meadville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grand junction at 8%, compared to 6% in Meadville.
  • In Grand junction, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Meadville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Meadville Grand junction
Mental Health Not Good 19.2% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 14.0% 11.8%
Depression 26.6% 24.5%
Smoking 24.2% 17.3%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 19.2%
Obesity 41.5% 29.2%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Meadville vs Grand junction

  • More residents in Meadville report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.8% in Grand junction.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Meadville at 26.6% compared to 24.5% in Grand junction.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Meadville at 24.2% compared to 17.3% in Grand junction.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Grand junction at 19.2% compared to 16.6% in Meadville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Meadville at 41.5% compared to 29.2% in Grand junction.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Meadville at 21.0% compared to 15.0% in Grand junction.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Meadville Grand junction
No Schooling 0.2% (29) 0.4% (245)
High School Diploma 24.5% (3,110) 13.9% (9,476)
Less than High School 8.6% (1,085) 9.7% (6,605)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.4% (1,953) 23.8% (16,201)

Education Levels Comparison: Meadville vs Grand junction

  • In Grand junction, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Meadville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Meadville hold a high school diploma at 24.5% compared to 13.9% in Grand junction.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Grand junction at 9.7%, compared to 8.6% in Meadville.
  • In Grand junction, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 15.4% in Meadville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.