Demographics details for Meadville, PA vs Gloverville, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Meadville, PA vs Gloverville, SC.
Data | Meadville | Gloverville |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,680 | 3,099 |
Median Age | 35.7 years | 31.4 years |
Median Income | $46,157 | $46,643 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 20.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Meadville vs Gloverville
- In Meadville, the population is higher at 12,680, compared to 3,099 in Gloverville.
- Residents in Meadville have a higher median age of 35.7 years compared to 31.4 years in Gloverville.
- Gloverville has a higher median income of $46,643, compared to $46,157 in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Meadville at 27.0% compared to 20.0% in Gloverville.
- The poverty level is identical in both Meadville and Gloverville at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Meadville is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.5% in Gloverville.
Demographics
Demographics Meadville vs Gloverville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Meadville | Gloverville |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 18 |
White | 86 | 76 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 6 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Meadville vs Gloverville
- In Gloverville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 5% in Meadville.
- Meadville has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 76% in Gloverville.
- The Asian population is larger in Meadville at 1% compared to 0% in Gloverville.
- Gloverville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Meadville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Meadville at 6% compared to 0% in Gloverville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Meadville and Gloverville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Meadville | Gloverville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 20.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 15.8% |
Depression | 26.6% | 24.7% |
Smoking | 24.2% | 25.0% |
Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 16.1% |
Obesity | 41.5% | 39.3% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Meadville vs Gloverville
- In Gloverville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 19.2% in Meadville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Meadville at 26.6% compared to 24.7% in Gloverville.
- Gloverville has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 24.2% in Meadville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Meadville at 16.6% compared to 16.1% in Gloverville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Meadville at 41.5% compared to 39.3% in Gloverville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gloverville at 24.0% compared to 21.0% in Meadville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Meadville | Gloverville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (29) | 0.8% (25) |
High School Diploma | 24.5% (3,110) | 29.9% (927) |
Less than High School | 8.6% (1,085) | 19.7% (610) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.4% (1,953) | 4.3% (134) |
Education Levels Comparison: Meadville vs Gloverville
- In Gloverville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.2% in Meadville.
- In Gloverville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.9% compared to 24.5% in Meadville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gloverville at 19.7%, compared to 8.6% in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Meadville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.4% compared to 4.3% in Gloverville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.