Demographics details for Meadville, PA vs Fort worth, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Meadville, PA vs Fort worth, TX.
Data | Meadville | Fort worth |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,680 | 956,709 |
Median Age | 35.7 years | 33.2 years |
Median Income | $46,157 | $72,726 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Meadville vs Fort worth
- The population in Fort worth is higher at 956,709, compared to 12,680 in Meadville.
- Residents in Meadville have a higher median age of 35.7 years compared to 33.2 years in Fort worth.
- Fort worth has a higher median income of $72,726, compared to $46,157 in Meadville.
- In Fort worth, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 27.0% in Meadville.
- Meadville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Fort worth.
- The unemployment rate in Meadville is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.7% in Fort worth.
Demographics
Demographics Meadville vs Fort worth provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Meadville | Fort worth |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 19 |
White | 86 | 29 |
Asian | 1 | 5 |
Hispanic | 2 | 34 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 12 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Meadville vs Fort worth
- In Fort worth, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 5% in Meadville.
- Meadville has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 29% in Fort worth.
- In Fort worth, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Meadville.
- Fort worth has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 2% in Meadville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort worth at 12%, compared to 6% in Meadville.
- In Fort worth, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Meadville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Meadville | Fort worth |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 17.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 12.7% |
Depression | 26.6% | 22.5% |
Smoking | 24.2% | 16.7% |
Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 16.2% |
Obesity | 41.5% | 36.7% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Meadville vs Fort worth
- More residents in Meadville report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.0% in Fort worth.
- Depression is more prevalent in Meadville at 26.6% compared to 22.5% in Fort worth.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Meadville at 24.2% compared to 16.7% in Fort worth.
- Binge drinking is more common in Meadville at 16.6% compared to 16.2% in Fort worth.
- Obesity rates are higher in Meadville at 41.5% compared to 36.7% in Fort worth.
- Disability percentages are higher in Meadville at 21.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort worth.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Meadville | Fort worth |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (29) | 1.6% (14,888) |
High School Diploma | 24.5% (3,110) | 12.9% (123,330) |
Less than High School | 8.6% (1,085) | 17.7% (168,884) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.4% (1,953) | 19.1% (182,276) |
Education Levels Comparison: Meadville vs Fort worth
- In Fort worth, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.2% in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Meadville hold a high school diploma at 24.5% compared to 12.9% in Fort worth.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort worth at 17.7%, compared to 8.6% in Meadville.
- In Fort worth, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 15.4% in Meadville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.