Demographics details for Meadville, PA vs Concord, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Meadville, PA vs Concord, CA.
| Data | Meadville | Concord |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,680 | 122,625 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $46,157 | $107,789 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Meadville vs Concord
- The population in Concord is higher at 122,625, compared to 12,680 in Meadville.
- The median age in Concord is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 35.7 years in Meadville.
- Concord has a higher median income of $107,789, compared to $46,157 in Meadville.
- In Concord, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 27.0% in Meadville.
- Meadville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Concord.
- The unemployment rate in Meadville is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.4% in Concord.
Demographics
Demographics Meadville vs Concord provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Meadville | Concord |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 4 |
| White | 86 | 33 |
| Asian | 1 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 32 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Meadville vs Concord
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Meadville at 5% compared to 4% in Concord.
- Meadville has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 33% in Concord.
- In Concord, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 1% in Meadville.
- Concord has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 2% in Meadville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Concord at 16%, compared to 6% in Meadville.
- In Concord, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Meadville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Meadville | Concord |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 24.2% | 10.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 41.5% | 25.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Meadville vs Concord
- More residents in Meadville report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 14.9% in Concord.
- Depression is more prevalent in Meadville at 26.6% compared to 17.8% in Concord.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Meadville at 24.2% compared to 10.7% in Concord.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Concord at 17.0% compared to 16.6% in Meadville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Meadville at 41.5% compared to 25.6% in Concord.
- Disability percentages are higher in Meadville at 21.0% compared to 12.0% in Concord.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Meadville | Concord |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (29) | 1.8% (2,147) |
| High School Diploma | 24.5% (3,110) | 13.0% (15,969) |
| Less than High School | 8.6% (1,085) | 15.7% (19,274) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.4% (1,953) | 27.1% (33,174) |
Education Levels Comparison: Meadville vs Concord
- In Concord, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.2% in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Meadville hold a high school diploma at 24.5% compared to 13.0% in Concord.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Concord at 15.7%, compared to 8.6% in Meadville.
- In Concord, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 15.4% in Meadville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.