Demographics details for Meadville, PA vs Abilene, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Meadville, PA vs Abilene, TX.
| Data | Meadville | Abilene |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,680 | 127,385 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 32.2 years |
| Median Income | $46,157 | $59,254 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Meadville vs Abilene
- The population in Abilene is higher at 127,385, compared to 12,680 in Meadville.
- Residents in Meadville have a higher median age of 35.7 years compared to 32.2 years in Abilene.
- Abilene has a higher median income of $59,254, compared to $46,157 in Meadville.
- In Abilene, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 27.0% in Meadville.
- The poverty level is identical in both Meadville and Abilene at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Meadville is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.0% in Abilene.
Demographics
Demographics Meadville vs Abilene provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Meadville | Abilene |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 10 |
| White | 86 | 49 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Meadville vs Abilene
- In Abilene, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 5% in Meadville.
- Meadville has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 49% in Abilene.
- In Abilene, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Meadville.
- Abilene has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 2% in Meadville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Abilene at 12%, compared to 6% in Meadville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Meadville and Abilene at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Meadville | Abilene |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 24.2% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 41.5% | 35.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Meadville vs Abilene
- More residents in Meadville report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.7% in Abilene.
- Depression is more prevalent in Meadville at 26.6% compared to 22.8% in Abilene.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Meadville at 24.2% compared to 18.2% in Abilene.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Abilene at 18.3% compared to 16.6% in Meadville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Meadville at 41.5% compared to 35.8% in Abilene.
- Disability percentages are higher in Meadville at 21.0% compared to 13.0% in Abilene.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Meadville | Abilene |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (29) | 0.9% (1,096) |
| High School Diploma | 24.5% (3,110) | 13.7% (17,400) |
| Less than High School | 8.6% (1,085) | 13.7% (17,433) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.4% (1,953) | 16.0% (20,428) |
Education Levels Comparison: Meadville vs Abilene
- In Abilene, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.2% in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Meadville hold a high school diploma at 24.5% compared to 13.7% in Abilene.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Abilene at 13.7%, compared to 8.6% in Meadville.
- In Abilene, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 15.4% in Meadville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.