Demographics details for Meade, KS vs Salt lake city, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Meade, KS vs Salt lake city, UT.
Data | Meade | Salt lake city |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,897 | 204,657 |
Median Age | 37.7 years | 32.5 years |
Median Income | $74,063 | $72,357 |
Married Families | 46.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Meade vs Salt lake city
- The population in Salt lake city is higher at 204,657, compared to 3,897 in Meade.
- Residents in Meade have a higher median age of 37.7 years compared to 32.5 years in Salt lake city.
- Meade has a higher median income of $74,063 compared to $72,357 in Salt lake city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Meade at 46.0% compared to 33.0% in Salt lake city.
- The poverty level is higher in Salt lake city at 13%, compared to 9% in Meade.
- Salt lake city has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.9% in Meade.
Demographics
Demographics Meade vs Salt lake city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Meade | Salt lake city |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 3 |
White | 69 | 63 |
Asian | 1 | 5 |
Hispanic | 23 | 20 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Meade vs Salt lake city
- In Salt lake city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Meade.
- Meade has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 63% in Salt lake city.
- In Salt lake city, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Meade.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Meade at 23% compared to 20% in Salt lake city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Salt lake city at 8%, compared to 6% in Meade.
- In Salt lake city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Meade.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Meade | Salt lake city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 18.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 11.1% |
Depression | 20.0% | 26.2% |
Smoking | 18.2% | 9.2% |
Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 40.1% | 31.8% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Meade vs Salt lake city
- In Salt lake city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.8% in Meade.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Salt lake city at 26.2% versus 20.0% in Meade.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Meade at 18.2% compared to 9.2% in Salt lake city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Meade at 18.8% compared to 14.8% in Salt lake city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Meade at 40.1% compared to 31.8% in Salt lake city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Salt lake city at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Meade.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Meade | Salt lake city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (9) | 1.3% (2,733) |
High School Diploma | 13.7% (532) | 9.3% (19,020) |
Less than High School | 18.0% (701) | 10.5% (21,475) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.9% (619) | 33.0% (67,504) |
Education Levels Comparison: Meade vs Salt lake city
- In Salt lake city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.2% in Meade.
- A higher percentage of residents in Meade hold a high school diploma at 13.7% compared to 9.3% in Salt lake city.
- More residents in Meade have less than a high school education at 18.0% compared to 10.5% in Salt lake city.
- In Salt lake city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.0% compared to 15.9% in Meade.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.