Demographics details for Mead, WA vs Pangburn, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mead, WA vs Pangburn, AR.
| Data | Mead | Pangburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,275 | 503 |
| Median Age | 36.0 years | 40.4 years |
| Median Income | $85,000 | $29,024 |
| Married Families | 55.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Mead vs Pangburn
- In Mead, the population is higher at 7,275, compared to 503 in Pangburn.
- The median age in Pangburn is higher at 40.4 years, compared to 36.0 years in Mead.
- Mead has a higher median income of $85,000 compared to $29,024 in Pangburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mead at 55.0% compared to 42.0% in Pangburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Pangburn at 18%, compared to 5% in Mead.
- Pangburn has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Mead.
Demographics
Demographics Mead vs Pangburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mead | Pangburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 95 | 94 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mead vs Pangburn
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mead at 1% compared to 0% in Pangburn.
- Mead has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 94% in Pangburn.
- The Asian population is larger in Mead at 2% compared to 0% in Pangburn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mead at 1% compared to 0% in Pangburn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pangburn at 6%, compared to 1% in Mead.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mead and Pangburn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mead | Pangburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 14.2% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 27.4% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 24.3% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mead vs Pangburn
- In Pangburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pangburn at 27.4% versus 0.0% in Mead.
- Pangburn has a higher smoking rate at 24.3% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pangburn at 15.1% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- Pangburn has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pangburn at 28.0% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mead | Pangburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 35.8% (180) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 12.1% (61) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 8.0% (40) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mead vs Pangburn
- In Pangburn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- In Pangburn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 35.8% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pangburn at 12.1%, compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- In Pangburn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.