Demographics details for Mead, WA vs Centralia, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mead, WA vs Centralia, IL.
| Data | Mead | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,275 | 11,931 |
| Median Age | 36.0 years | 40.7 years |
| Median Income | $85,000 | $46,468 |
| Married Families | 55.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Mead vs Centralia
- The population in Centralia is higher at 11,931, compared to 7,275 in Mead.
- The median age in Centralia is higher at 40.7 years, compared to 36.0 years in Mead.
- Mead has a higher median income of $85,000 compared to $46,468 in Centralia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mead at 55.0% compared to 33.0% in Centralia.
- The poverty level is higher in Centralia at 12%, compared to 5% in Mead.
- Centralia has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Mead.
Demographics
Demographics Mead vs Centralia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mead | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 10 |
| White | 95 | 79 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mead vs Centralia
- In Centralia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 1% in Mead.
- Mead has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 79% in Centralia.
- Both Mead and Centralia have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Centralia has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Mead.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Centralia at 5%, compared to 1% in Mead.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mead and Centralia at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mead | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 13.8% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 22.7% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mead vs Centralia
- In Centralia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Centralia at 23.9% versus 0.0% in Mead.
- Centralia has a higher smoking rate at 22.7% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Centralia at 16.4% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- Centralia has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Centralia at 22.0% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mead | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (72) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 18.8% (2,243) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 13.7% (1,638) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 12.5% (1,494) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mead vs Centralia
- In Centralia, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- In Centralia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Centralia at 13.7%, compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- In Centralia, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.