Demographics details for Mcpherson, KS vs Yoder, WY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcpherson, KS vs Yoder, WY.
| Data | Mcpherson | Yoder |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,865 | 131 |
| Median Age | 36.2 years | 56.2 years |
| Median Income | $69,807 | $27,417 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Mcpherson vs Yoder
- In Mcpherson, the population is higher at 13,865, compared to 131 in Yoder.
- The median age in Yoder is higher at 56.2 years, compared to 36.2 years in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has a higher median income of $69,807 compared to $27,417 in Yoder.
- In Yoder, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 43.0% in Mcpherson.
- The poverty level is higher in Yoder at 11%, compared to 9% in Mcpherson.
- Yoder has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.3% in Mcpherson.
Demographics
Demographics Mcpherson vs Yoder provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mcpherson | Yoder |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 87 | 92 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Yoder
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mcpherson at 2% compared to 0% in Yoder.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Yoder at 92% compared to 87% in Mcpherson.
- The Asian population is larger in Mcpherson at 1% compared to 0% in Yoder.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mcpherson at 6% compared to 0% in Yoder.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Yoder at 8%, compared to 4% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mcpherson and Yoder at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mcpherson | Yoder |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 20.6% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 17.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 29.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 37.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Yoder
- In Yoder, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 15.2% in Mcpherson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Yoder at 20.6% versus 20.1% in Mcpherson.
- Yoder has a higher smoking rate at 17.9% compared to 17.6% in Mcpherson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mcpherson at 18.2% compared to 17.7% in Yoder.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mcpherson at 36.6% compared to 29.4% in Yoder.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Yoder at 37.0% compared to 14.0% in Mcpherson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mcpherson | Yoder |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (48) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.8% (1,775) | 12.2% (16) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (804) | 15.3% (20) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.7% (3,010) | 6.9% (9) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcpherson vs Yoder
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Yoder.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson hold a high school diploma at 12.8% compared to 12.2% in Yoder.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Yoder at 15.3%, compared to 5.8% in Mcpherson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 6.9% in Yoder.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.