Demographics details for Mcpherson, KS vs Springhill, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcpherson, KS vs Springhill, LA.
| Data | Mcpherson | Springhill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,865 | 4,575 |
| Median Age | 36.2 years | 46.1 years |
| Median Income | $69,807 | $27,868 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Mcpherson vs Springhill
- In Mcpherson, the population is higher at 13,865, compared to 4,575 in Springhill.
- The median age in Springhill is higher at 46.1 years, compared to 36.2 years in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has a higher median income of $69,807 compared to $27,868 in Springhill.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mcpherson at 43.0% compared to 34.0% in Springhill.
- The poverty level is higher in Springhill at 20%, compared to 9% in Mcpherson.
- Springhill has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.3% in Mcpherson.
Demographics
Demographics Mcpherson vs Springhill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mcpherson | Springhill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 34 |
| White | 87 | 55 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Springhill
- In Springhill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 34% compared to 2% in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 55% in Springhill.
- The Asian population is larger in Mcpherson at 1% compared to 0% in Springhill.
- Springhill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 6% in Mcpherson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mcpherson at 4% compared to 2% in Springhill.
- In Springhill, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mcpherson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mcpherson | Springhill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 23.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 18.7% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 29.9% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 31.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 45.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Springhill
- In Springhill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 23.7% compared to 15.2% in Mcpherson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Springhill at 29.9% versus 20.1% in Mcpherson.
- Springhill has a higher smoking rate at 31.4% compared to 17.6% in Mcpherson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mcpherson at 18.2% compared to 15.2% in Springhill.
- Springhill has higher obesity rates at 45.4% compared to 36.6% in Mcpherson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Springhill at 21.0% compared to 14.0% in Mcpherson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mcpherson | Springhill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (48) | 2.3% (104) |
| High School Diploma | 12.8% (1,775) | 22.5% (1,028) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (804) | 24.5% (1,122) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.7% (3,010) | 6.1% (277) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcpherson vs Springhill
- In Springhill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.3% in Mcpherson.
- In Springhill, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.5% compared to 12.8% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Springhill at 24.5%, compared to 5.8% in Mcpherson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 6.1% in Springhill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.