Demographics details for Mcpherson, KS vs Riverton, WY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcpherson, KS vs Riverton, WY.
| Data | Mcpherson | Riverton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,865 | 10,776 |
| Median Age | 36.2 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $69,807 | $50,861 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Mcpherson vs Riverton
- In Mcpherson, the population is higher at 13,865, compared to 10,776 in Riverton.
- The median age in Riverton is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 36.2 years in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has a higher median income of $69,807 compared to $50,861 in Riverton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mcpherson at 43.0% compared to 32.0% in Riverton.
- Mcpherson has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Riverton.
- The unemployment rate in Mcpherson is higher at 3.3%, compared to 2.5% in Riverton.
Demographics
Demographics Mcpherson vs Riverton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mcpherson | Riverton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 87 | 69 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 10 |
Demographics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Riverton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mcpherson at 2% compared to 1% in Riverton.
- Mcpherson has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 69% in Riverton.
- Both Mcpherson and Riverton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Riverton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 6% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Riverton at 6%, compared to 4% in Mcpherson.
- In Riverton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 10%, compared to 0% in Mcpherson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mcpherson | Riverton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 11.5% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 20.9% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 19.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 32.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Riverton
- In Riverton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 15.2% in Mcpherson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Riverton at 20.9% versus 20.1% in Mcpherson.
- Riverton has a higher smoking rate at 19.1% compared to 17.6% in Mcpherson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mcpherson at 18.2% compared to 17.8% in Riverton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mcpherson at 36.6% compared to 32.3% in Riverton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mcpherson at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Riverton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mcpherson | Riverton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (48) | 0.8% (87) |
| High School Diploma | 12.8% (1,775) | 18.6% (2,000) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (804) | 6.5% (701) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.7% (3,010) | 13.8% (1,483) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcpherson vs Riverton
- In Riverton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.3% in Mcpherson.
- In Riverton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.6% compared to 12.8% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Riverton at 6.5%, compared to 5.8% in Mcpherson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 13.8% in Riverton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.