Demographics details for Mcpherson, KS vs Pekin, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcpherson, KS vs Pekin, IL.
| Data | Mcpherson | Pekin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,865 | 31,260 |
| Median Age | 36.2 years | 41.2 years |
| Median Income | $69,807 | $52,507 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 6.4 |
Population Comparison: Mcpherson vs Pekin
- The population in Pekin is higher at 31,260, compared to 13,865 in Mcpherson.
- The median age in Pekin is higher at 41.2 years, compared to 36.2 years in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has a higher median income of $69,807 compared to $52,507 in Pekin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mcpherson at 43.0% compared to 34.0% in Pekin.
- The poverty level is higher in Pekin at 12%, compared to 9% in Mcpherson.
- Pekin has a higher unemployment rate at 6.4% compared to 3.3% in Mcpherson.
Demographics
Demographics Mcpherson vs Pekin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mcpherson | Pekin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 3 |
| White | 87 | 89 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Pekin
- In Pekin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pekin at 89% compared to 87% in Mcpherson.
- Both Mcpherson and Pekin have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mcpherson at 6% compared to 3% in Pekin.
- Both Mcpherson and Pekin have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mcpherson and Pekin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mcpherson | Pekin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 17.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 19.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 38.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Pekin
- In Pekin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 15.2% in Mcpherson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pekin at 23.2% versus 20.1% in Mcpherson.
- Pekin has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 17.6% in Mcpherson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mcpherson at 18.2% compared to 17.3% in Pekin.
- Pekin has higher obesity rates at 38.0% compared to 36.6% in Mcpherson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pekin at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Mcpherson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mcpherson | Pekin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (48) | 0.7% (204) |
| High School Diploma | 12.8% (1,775) | 21.2% (6,641) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (804) | 13.9% (4,351) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.7% (3,010) | 13.2% (4,126) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcpherson vs Pekin
- In Pekin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in Mcpherson.
- In Pekin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.2% compared to 12.8% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pekin at 13.9%, compared to 5.8% in Mcpherson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 13.2% in Pekin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.