Demographics details for Mcpherson, KS vs Paulden, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcpherson, KS vs Paulden, AZ.
| Data | Mcpherson | Paulden |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,865 | 4,518 |
| Median Age | 36.2 years | 49.5 years |
| Median Income | $69,807 | $65,417 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Mcpherson vs Paulden
- In Mcpherson, the population is higher at 13,865, compared to 4,518 in Paulden.
- The median age in Paulden is higher at 49.5 years, compared to 36.2 years in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has a higher median income of $69,807 compared to $65,417 in Paulden.
- In Paulden, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 43.0% in Mcpherson.
- The poverty level is higher in Paulden at 12%, compared to 9% in Mcpherson.
- Paulden has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.3% in Mcpherson.
Demographics
Demographics Mcpherson vs Paulden provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mcpherson | Paulden |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 87 | 70 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 24 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Paulden
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mcpherson at 2% compared to 0% in Paulden.
- Mcpherson has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 70% in Paulden.
- Both Mcpherson and Paulden have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Paulden has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 6% in Mcpherson.
- Both Mcpherson and Paulden have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- In Paulden, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mcpherson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mcpherson | Paulden |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 19.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 29.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Paulden
- In Paulden, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 15.2% in Mcpherson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Paulden at 22.8% versus 20.1% in Mcpherson.
- Paulden has a higher smoking rate at 19.7% compared to 17.6% in Mcpherson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mcpherson at 18.2% compared to 16.3% in Paulden.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mcpherson at 36.6% compared to 29.4% in Paulden.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Paulden at 21.0% compared to 14.0% in Mcpherson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mcpherson | Paulden |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (48) | 2.1% (94) |
| High School Diploma | 12.8% (1,775) | 22.8% (1,032) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (804) | 17.7% (798) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.7% (3,010) | 10.2% (461) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcpherson vs Paulden
- In Paulden, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.3% in Mcpherson.
- In Paulden, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.8% compared to 12.8% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Paulden at 17.7%, compared to 5.8% in Mcpherson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 10.2% in Paulden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.