Demographics details for Mcpherson, KS vs Papillion, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcpherson, KS vs Papillion, NE.
| Data | Mcpherson | Papillion |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,865 | 23,794 |
| Median Age | 36.2 years | 40.3 years |
| Median Income | $69,807 | $104,608 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Mcpherson vs Papillion
- The population in Papillion is higher at 23,794, compared to 13,865 in Mcpherson.
- The median age in Papillion is higher at 40.3 years, compared to 36.2 years in Mcpherson.
- Papillion has a higher median income of $104,608, compared to $69,807 in Mcpherson.
- In Papillion, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 43.0% in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Papillion.
- The unemployment rate in Mcpherson is higher at 3.3%, compared to 3.2% in Papillion.
Demographics
Demographics Mcpherson vs Papillion provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mcpherson | Papillion |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 3 |
| White | 87 | 83 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Papillion
- In Papillion, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 83% in Papillion.
- In Papillion, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Mcpherson.
- Papillion has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 6% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Papillion at 5%, compared to 4% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mcpherson and Papillion at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mcpherson | Papillion |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 12.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 7.6% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 17.5% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 12.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 21.3% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 36.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Papillion
- More residents in Mcpherson report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 12.4% in Papillion.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mcpherson at 20.1% compared to 17.5% in Papillion.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mcpherson at 17.6% compared to 12.1% in Papillion.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Papillion at 21.3% compared to 18.2% in Mcpherson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mcpherson at 36.6% compared to 36.3% in Papillion.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mcpherson at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Papillion.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mcpherson | Papillion |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (48) | 0.2% (48) |
| High School Diploma | 12.8% (1,775) | 11.6% (2,751) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (804) | 3.8% (910) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.7% (3,010) | 31.8% (7,575) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcpherson vs Papillion
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.2% in Papillion.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson hold a high school diploma at 12.8% compared to 11.6% in Papillion.
- More residents in Mcpherson have less than a high school education at 5.8% compared to 3.8% in Papillion.
- In Papillion, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 21.7% in Mcpherson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.