Demographics details for Mcpherson, KS vs Navajo dam, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcpherson, KS vs Navajo dam, NM.
| Data | Mcpherson | Navajo dam |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,865 | 330 |
| Median Age | 36.2 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $69,807 | $63,375 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Mcpherson vs Navajo dam
- In Mcpherson, the population is higher at 13,865, compared to 330 in Navajo dam.
- The median age in Navajo dam is higher at 36.6 years, compared to 36.2 years in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has a higher median income of $69,807 compared to $63,375 in Navajo dam.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mcpherson at 43.0% compared to 34.0% in Navajo dam.
- The poverty level is higher in Navajo dam at 14%, compared to 9% in Mcpherson.
- Navajo dam has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.3% in Mcpherson.
Demographics
Demographics Mcpherson vs Navajo dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mcpherson | Navajo dam |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 87 | 16 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 67 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 6 |
Demographics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Navajo dam
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mcpherson at 2% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- Mcpherson has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 16% in Navajo dam.
- The Asian population is larger in Mcpherson at 1% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- Navajo dam has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 67%, compared to 6% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Navajo dam at 11%, compared to 4% in Mcpherson.
- In Navajo dam, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 6%, compared to 0% in Mcpherson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mcpherson | Navajo dam |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 11.2% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 32.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Navajo dam
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Mcpherson and Navajo dam at 15.2%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mcpherson at 20.1% compared to 17.8% in Navajo dam.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mcpherson at 17.6% compared to 15.0% in Navajo dam.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mcpherson at 18.2% compared to 14.1% in Navajo dam.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mcpherson at 36.6% compared to 32.6% in Navajo dam.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Mcpherson and Navajo dam at 14.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mcpherson | Navajo dam |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (48) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.8% (1,775) | 4.8% (16) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (804) | 6.1% (20) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.7% (3,010) | 22.7% (75) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcpherson vs Navajo dam
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Navajo dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson hold a high school diploma at 12.8% compared to 4.8% in Navajo dam.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Navajo dam at 6.1%, compared to 5.8% in Mcpherson.
- In Navajo dam, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.7% compared to 21.7% in Mcpherson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.