Demographics details for Mcpherson, KS vs Litchfield, ME
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcpherson, KS vs Litchfield, ME.
Data | Mcpherson | Litchfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,865 | 3,642 |
Median Age | 36.2 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $69,807 | $85,000 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 60.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Mcpherson vs Litchfield
- In Mcpherson, the population is higher at 13,865, compared to 3,642 in Litchfield.
- The median age in Litchfield is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 36.2 years in Mcpherson.
- Litchfield has a higher median income of $85,000, compared to $69,807 in Mcpherson.
- In Litchfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 43.0% in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Litchfield.
- The unemployment rate in Mcpherson is higher at 3.3%, compared to 2.5% in Litchfield.
Demographics
Demographics Mcpherson vs Litchfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mcpherson | Litchfield |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 1 |
White | 87 | 96 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 6 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Litchfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mcpherson at 2% compared to 1% in Litchfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Litchfield at 96% compared to 87% in Mcpherson.
- Both Mcpherson and Litchfield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mcpherson at 6% compared to 1% in Litchfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mcpherson at 4% compared to 1% in Litchfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mcpherson and Litchfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mcpherson | Litchfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 20.1% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 17.6% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 18.2% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 36.6% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Litchfield
- More residents in Mcpherson report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mcpherson at 20.1% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mcpherson at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mcpherson at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mcpherson at 36.6% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mcpherson at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mcpherson | Litchfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (48) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 12.8% (1,775) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 5.8% (804) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.7% (3,010) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcpherson vs Litchfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson hold a high school diploma at 12.8% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- More residents in Mcpherson have less than a high school education at 5.8% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.