Demographics details for Mcpherson, KS vs Jackson, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcpherson, KS vs Jackson, MI.
| Data | Mcpherson | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,865 | 31,031 |
| Median Age | 36.2 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $69,807 | $41,988 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 7.9 |
Population Comparison: Mcpherson vs Jackson
- The population in Jackson is higher at 31,031, compared to 13,865 in Mcpherson.
- Residents in Mcpherson have a higher median age of 36.2 years compared to 35.0 years in Jackson.
- Mcpherson has a higher median income of $69,807 compared to $41,988 in Jackson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mcpherson at 43.0% compared to 27.0% in Jackson.
- The poverty level is higher in Jackson at 21%, compared to 9% in Mcpherson.
- Jackson has a higher unemployment rate at 7.9% compared to 3.3% in Mcpherson.
Demographics
Demographics Mcpherson vs Jackson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mcpherson | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 21 |
| White | 87 | 62 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Jackson
- In Jackson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 2% in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 62% in Jackson.
- Both Mcpherson and Jackson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Mcpherson and Jackson at 6%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Jackson at 10%, compared to 4% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mcpherson and Jackson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mcpherson | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 21.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 15.0% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 27.0% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 26.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 41.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Jackson
- In Jackson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 15.2% in Mcpherson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Jackson at 27.0% versus 20.1% in Mcpherson.
- Jackson has a higher smoking rate at 26.4% compared to 17.6% in Mcpherson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mcpherson at 18.2% compared to 14.9% in Jackson.
- Jackson has higher obesity rates at 41.0% compared to 36.6% in Mcpherson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jackson at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Mcpherson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mcpherson | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (48) | 0.5% (166) |
| High School Diploma | 12.8% (1,775) | 21.1% (6,548) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (804) | 14.2% (4,397) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.7% (3,010) | 10.1% (3,126) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcpherson vs Jackson
- In Jackson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Mcpherson.
- In Jackson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.1% compared to 12.8% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jackson at 14.2%, compared to 5.8% in Mcpherson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 10.1% in Jackson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.