Demographics details for Mcpherson, KS vs Horn lake, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcpherson, KS vs Horn lake, MS.
| Data | Mcpherson | Horn lake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,865 | 26,550 |
| Median Age | 36.2 years | 35.5 years |
| Median Income | $69,807 | $57,111 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Mcpherson vs Horn lake
- The population in Horn lake is higher at 26,550, compared to 13,865 in Mcpherson.
- Residents in Mcpherson have a higher median age of 36.2 years compared to 35.5 years in Horn lake.
- Mcpherson has a higher median income of $69,807 compared to $57,111 in Horn lake.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mcpherson at 43.0% compared to 31.0% in Horn lake.
- The poverty level is higher in Horn lake at 19%, compared to 9% in Mcpherson.
- Horn lake has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.3% in Mcpherson.
Demographics
Demographics Mcpherson vs Horn lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mcpherson | Horn lake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 45 |
| White | 87 | 40 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Horn lake
- In Horn lake, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 45% compared to 2% in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 40% in Horn lake.
- Both Mcpherson and Horn lake have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Horn lake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 6% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Horn lake at 5%, compared to 4% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mcpherson and Horn lake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mcpherson | Horn lake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 20.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 12.9% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 43.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Horn lake
- In Horn lake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 15.2% in Mcpherson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Horn lake at 23.5% versus 20.1% in Mcpherson.
- Horn lake has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 17.6% in Mcpherson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mcpherson at 18.2% compared to 12.9% in Horn lake.
- Horn lake has higher obesity rates at 43.4% compared to 36.6% in Mcpherson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mcpherson at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Horn lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mcpherson | Horn lake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (48) | 0.9% (252) |
| High School Diploma | 12.8% (1,775) | 18.1% (4,818) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (804) | 16.3% (4,319) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.7% (3,010) | 10.5% (2,777) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcpherson vs Horn lake
- In Horn lake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.3% in Mcpherson.
- In Horn lake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.1% compared to 12.8% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Horn lake at 16.3%, compared to 5.8% in Mcpherson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 10.5% in Horn lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.