Demographics details for Mcpherson, KS vs Haslett, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcpherson, KS vs Haslett, MI.
| Data | Mcpherson | Haslett |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,865 | 19,091 |
| Median Age | 36.2 years | 41.0 years |
| Median Income | $69,807 | $72,380 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Mcpherson vs Haslett
- The population in Haslett is higher at 19,091, compared to 13,865 in Mcpherson.
- The median age in Haslett is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 36.2 years in Mcpherson.
- Haslett has a higher median income of $72,380, compared to $69,807 in Mcpherson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mcpherson at 43.0% compared to 41.0% in Haslett.
- Mcpherson has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 7% in Haslett.
- The unemployment rate in Mcpherson is higher at 3.3%, compared to 3.2% in Haslett.
Demographics
Demographics Mcpherson vs Haslett provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mcpherson | Haslett |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 3 |
| White | 87 | 76 |
| Asian | 1 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Haslett
- In Haslett, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 76% in Haslett.
- In Haslett, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 1% in Mcpherson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mcpherson at 6% compared to 5% in Haslett.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Haslett at 8%, compared to 4% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mcpherson and Haslett at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mcpherson | Haslett |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 24.8% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 11.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 32.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Haslett
- In Haslett, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 15.2% in Mcpherson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Haslett at 24.8% versus 20.1% in Mcpherson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mcpherson at 17.6% compared to 11.8% in Haslett.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Mcpherson and Haslett at 18.2%.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mcpherson at 36.6% compared to 32.3% in Haslett.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mcpherson at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Haslett.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mcpherson | Haslett |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (48) | 0.1% (15) |
| High School Diploma | 12.8% (1,775) | 8.6% (1,648) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (804) | 3.4% (641) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.7% (3,010) | 42.1% (8,036) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcpherson vs Haslett
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.1% in Haslett.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson hold a high school diploma at 12.8% compared to 8.6% in Haslett.
- More residents in Mcpherson have less than a high school education at 5.8% compared to 3.4% in Haslett.
- In Haslett, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 21.7% in Mcpherson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.