Demographics details for Mcpherson, KS vs Ferndale, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcpherson, KS vs Ferndale, MI.
| Data | Mcpherson | Ferndale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,865 | 18,969 |
| Median Age | 36.2 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $69,807 | $86,120 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Mcpherson vs Ferndale
- The population in Ferndale is higher at 18,969, compared to 13,865 in Mcpherson.
- Residents in Mcpherson have a higher median age of 36.2 years compared to 35.7 years in Ferndale.
- Ferndale has a higher median income of $86,120, compared to $69,807 in Mcpherson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mcpherson at 43.0% compared to 32.0% in Ferndale.
- The poverty level is higher in Ferndale at 10%, compared to 9% in Mcpherson.
- Ferndale has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.3% in Mcpherson.
Demographics
Demographics Mcpherson vs Ferndale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mcpherson | Ferndale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 6 |
| White | 87 | 81 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Ferndale
- In Ferndale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 2% in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 81% in Ferndale.
- In Ferndale, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Mcpherson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mcpherson at 6% compared to 4% in Ferndale.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ferndale at 6%, compared to 4% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mcpherson and Ferndale at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mcpherson | Ferndale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 21.1% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 12.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 30.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Ferndale
- More residents in Mcpherson report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 14.6% in Ferndale.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ferndale at 21.1% versus 20.1% in Mcpherson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mcpherson at 17.6% compared to 12.7% in Ferndale.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ferndale at 19.0% compared to 18.2% in Mcpherson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mcpherson at 36.6% compared to 30.4% in Ferndale.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mcpherson at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Ferndale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mcpherson | Ferndale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (48) | 0.4% (81) |
| High School Diploma | 12.8% (1,775) | 11.3% (2,139) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (804) | 6.0% (1,132) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.7% (3,010) | 45.0% (8,533) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcpherson vs Ferndale
- In Ferndale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Mcpherson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson hold a high school diploma at 12.8% compared to 11.3% in Ferndale.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ferndale at 6.0%, compared to 5.8% in Mcpherson.
- In Ferndale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.0% compared to 21.7% in Mcpherson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.