Demographics details for Mcpherson, KS vs East waterford, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mcpherson, KS vs East waterford, PA.

Data Mcpherson East waterford
Population 13,865 145
Median Age 36.2 years 61.4 years
Median Income $69,807 $56,667
Married Families 43.0% 66.0%
Poverty Level 9% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.3 3.2

Population Comparison: Mcpherson vs East waterford

  • In Mcpherson, the population is higher at 13,865, compared to 145 in East waterford.
  • The median age in East waterford is higher at 61.4 years, compared to 36.2 years in Mcpherson.
  • Mcpherson has a higher median income of $69,807 compared to $56,667 in East waterford.
  • In East waterford, the percentage of married families is higher at 66.0%, compared to 43.0% in Mcpherson.
  • Mcpherson has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in East waterford.
  • The unemployment rate in Mcpherson is higher at 3.3%, compared to 3.2% in East waterford.

Demographics

Demographics Mcpherson vs East waterford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mcpherson East waterford
Black 2 Data is updating
White 87 100
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 6 Data is updating
Two or More Races 4 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Mcpherson vs East waterford

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mcpherson at 2% compared to 0% in East waterford.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in East waterford at 100% compared to 87% in Mcpherson.
  • The Asian population is larger in Mcpherson at 1% compared to 0% in East waterford.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Mcpherson at 6% compared to 0% in East waterford.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Mcpherson at 4% compared to 0% in East waterford.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mcpherson and East waterford at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mcpherson East waterford
Mental Health Not Good 15.2% 19.4%
Physical Health Not Good 9.7% 14.2%
Depression 20.1% 25.6%
Smoking 17.6% 25.8%
Binge Drinking 18.2% 17.7%
Obesity 36.6% 38.9%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mcpherson vs East waterford

  • In East waterford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 15.2% in Mcpherson.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in East waterford at 25.6% versus 20.1% in Mcpherson.
  • East waterford has a higher smoking rate at 25.8% compared to 17.6% in Mcpherson.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Mcpherson at 18.2% compared to 17.7% in East waterford.
  • East waterford has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 36.6% in Mcpherson.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mcpherson at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in East waterford.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mcpherson East waterford
No Schooling 0.3% (48) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 12.8% (1,775) 47.6% (69)
Less than High School 5.8% (804) 2.8% (4)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.7% (3,010) 18.6% (27)

Education Levels Comparison: Mcpherson vs East waterford

  • A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in East waterford.
  • In East waterford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 47.6% compared to 12.8% in Mcpherson.
  • More residents in Mcpherson have less than a high school education at 5.8% compared to 2.8% in East waterford.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 18.6% in East waterford.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.