Demographics details for Mcpherson, KS vs Christmas valley, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mcpherson, KS vs Christmas valley, OR.

Data Mcpherson Christmas valley
Population 13,865 1,313
Median Age 36.2 years 47.0 years
Median Income $69,807 $46,900
Married Families 43.0% 64.0%
Poverty Level 9% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.3 6.5

Population Comparison: Mcpherson vs Christmas valley

  • In Mcpherson, the population is higher at 13,865, compared to 1,313 in Christmas valley.
  • The median age in Christmas valley is higher at 47.0 years, compared to 36.2 years in Mcpherson.
  • Mcpherson has a higher median income of $69,807 compared to $46,900 in Christmas valley.
  • In Christmas valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 64.0%, compared to 43.0% in Mcpherson.
  • The poverty level is higher in Christmas valley at 15%, compared to 9% in Mcpherson.
  • Christmas valley has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 3.3% in Mcpherson.

Demographics

Demographics Mcpherson vs Christmas valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mcpherson Christmas valley
Black 2 1
White 87 94
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 6 2
Two or More Races 4 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Christmas valley

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mcpherson at 2% compared to 1% in Christmas valley.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Christmas valley at 94% compared to 87% in Mcpherson.
  • Both Mcpherson and Christmas valley have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Mcpherson at 6% compared to 2% in Christmas valley.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Mcpherson at 4% compared to 2% in Christmas valley.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mcpherson and Christmas valley at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mcpherson Christmas valley
Mental Health Not Good 15.2% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 9.7% Data is updating%
Depression 20.1% Data is updating%
Smoking 17.6% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 18.2% Data is updating%
Obesity 36.6% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 14.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Christmas valley

  • More residents in Mcpherson report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mcpherson at 20.1% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mcpherson at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Mcpherson at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mcpherson at 36.6% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mcpherson at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mcpherson Christmas valley
No Schooling 0.3% (48) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 12.8% (1,775) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 5.8% (804) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.7% (3,010) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Mcpherson vs Christmas valley

  • A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson hold a high school diploma at 12.8% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • More residents in Mcpherson have less than a high school education at 5.8% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.