Demographics details for Mcpherson, KS vs Avon by the sea, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mcpherson, KS vs Avon by the sea, NJ.

Data Mcpherson Avon by the sea
Population 13,865 1,940
Median Age 36.2 years 56.2 years
Median Income $69,807 $106,563
Married Families 43.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 9% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.3 4.2

Population Comparison: Mcpherson vs Avon by the sea

  • In Mcpherson, the population is higher at 13,865, compared to 1,940 in Avon by the sea.
  • The median age in Avon by the sea is higher at 56.2 years, compared to 36.2 years in Mcpherson.
  • Avon by the sea has a higher median income of $106,563, compared to $69,807 in Mcpherson.
  • In Avon by the sea, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 43.0% in Mcpherson.
  • Mcpherson has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Avon by the sea.
  • Avon by the sea has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.3% in Mcpherson.

Demographics

Demographics Mcpherson vs Avon by the sea provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mcpherson Avon by the sea
Black 2 1
White 87 88
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 6 6
Two or More Races 4 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Avon by the sea

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mcpherson at 2% compared to 1% in Avon by the sea.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Avon by the sea at 88% compared to 87% in Mcpherson.
  • Both Mcpherson and Avon by the sea have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Mcpherson and Avon by the sea at 6%.
  • Both Mcpherson and Avon by the sea have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mcpherson and Avon by the sea at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mcpherson Avon by the sea
Mental Health Not Good 15.2% 13.7%
Physical Health Not Good 9.7% 7.7%
Depression 20.1% 20.3%
Smoking 17.6% 9.9%
Binge Drinking 18.2% 19.5%
Obesity 36.6% 25.6%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Avon by the sea

  • More residents in Mcpherson report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 13.7% in Avon by the sea.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Avon by the sea at 20.3% versus 20.1% in Mcpherson.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mcpherson at 17.6% compared to 9.9% in Avon by the sea.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Avon by the sea at 19.5% compared to 18.2% in Mcpherson.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mcpherson at 36.6% compared to 25.6% in Avon by the sea.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mcpherson at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Avon by the sea.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mcpherson Avon by the sea
No Schooling 0.3% (48) 0.3% (6)
High School Diploma 12.8% (1,775) 9.7% (188)
Less than High School 5.8% (804) 3.5% (67)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.7% (3,010) 52.3% (1,014)

Education Levels Comparison: Mcpherson vs Avon by the sea

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Mcpherson and Avon by the sea at 0.3%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson hold a high school diploma at 12.8% compared to 9.7% in Avon by the sea.
  • More residents in Mcpherson have less than a high school education at 5.8% compared to 3.5% in Avon by the sea.
  • In Avon by the sea, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 52.3% compared to 21.7% in Mcpherson.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.