Demographics details for Mcminnville, OR vs Winger, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcminnville, OR vs Winger, MN.
Data | Mcminnville | Winger |
---|---|---|
Population | 34,530 | 173 |
Median Age | 40.1 years | 48.8 years |
Median Income | $65,318 | $42,500 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Mcminnville vs Winger
- In Mcminnville, the population is higher at 34,530, compared to 173 in Winger.
- The median age in Winger is higher at 48.8 years, compared to 40.1 years in Mcminnville.
- Mcminnville has a higher median income of $65,318 compared to $42,500 in Winger.
- In Winger, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 35.0% in Mcminnville.
- Mcminnville has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Winger.
- Winger has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.9% in Mcminnville.
Demographics
Demographics Mcminnville vs Winger provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mcminnville | Winger |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 67 | 88 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 18 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 12 | 10 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Mcminnville vs Winger
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Mcminnville and Winger at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Winger at 88% compared to 67% in Mcminnville.
- The Asian population is larger in Mcminnville at 2% compared to 1% in Winger.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mcminnville at 18% compared to 0% in Winger.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mcminnville at 12% compared to 10% in Winger.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mcminnville and Winger at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mcminnville | Winger |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 15.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 9.9% |
Depression | 27.2% | 24.3% |
Smoking | 15.6% | 19.8% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 21.9% |
Obesity | 35.1% | 39.6% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcminnville vs Winger
- More residents in Mcminnville report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.5% in Winger.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mcminnville at 27.2% compared to 24.3% in Winger.
- Winger has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 15.6% in Mcminnville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Winger at 21.9% compared to 17.6% in Mcminnville.
- Winger has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 35.1% in Mcminnville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mcminnville at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Winger.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mcminnville | Winger |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (472) | 2.3% (4) |
High School Diploma | 11.9% (4,114) | 14.5% (25) |
Less than High School | 16.8% (5,808) | 20.2% (35) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.7% (6,118) | 12.7% (22) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcminnville vs Winger
- In Winger, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 1.4% in Mcminnville.
- In Winger, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.5% compared to 11.9% in Mcminnville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Winger at 20.2%, compared to 16.8% in Mcminnville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcminnville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.7% compared to 12.7% in Winger.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.