Demographics details for Mcminnville, OR vs Siloam springs, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mcminnville, OR vs Siloam springs, AR.

Data Mcminnville Siloam springs
Population 34,530 18,654
Median Age 40.1 years 30.1 years
Median Income $65,318 $59,911
Married Families 35.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 10% 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.9 3.5

Population Comparison: Mcminnville vs Siloam springs

  • In Mcminnville, the population is higher at 34,530, compared to 18,654 in Siloam springs.
  • Residents in Mcminnville have a higher median age of 40.1 years compared to 30.1 years in Siloam springs.
  • Mcminnville has a higher median income of $65,318 compared to $59,911 in Siloam springs.
  • In Siloam springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 35.0% in Mcminnville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Siloam springs at 13%, compared to 10% in Mcminnville.
  • The unemployment rate in Mcminnville is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.5% in Siloam springs.

Demographics

Demographics Mcminnville vs Siloam springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mcminnville Siloam springs
Black Data is updating 1
White 67 50
Asian 2 3
Hispanic 18 23
Two or More Races 12 20
American Indian 1 3

Demographics Comparison: Mcminnville vs Siloam springs

  • In Siloam springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Mcminnville.
  • Mcminnville has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 50% in Siloam springs.
  • In Siloam springs, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Mcminnville.
  • Siloam springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 18% in Mcminnville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Siloam springs at 20%, compared to 12% in Mcminnville.
  • In Siloam springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 1% in Mcminnville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mcminnville Siloam springs
Mental Health Not Good 18.3% 20.0%
Physical Health Not Good 11.6% 15.0%
Depression 27.2% 26.0%
Smoking 15.6% 21.6%
Binge Drinking 17.6% 14.9%
Obesity 35.1% 39.2%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mcminnville vs Siloam springs

  • In Siloam springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 18.3% in Mcminnville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mcminnville at 27.2% compared to 26.0% in Siloam springs.
  • Siloam springs has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 15.6% in Mcminnville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Mcminnville at 17.6% compared to 14.9% in Siloam springs.
  • Siloam springs has higher obesity rates at 39.2% compared to 35.1% in Mcminnville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mcminnville at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Siloam springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mcminnville Siloam springs
No Schooling 1.4% (472) 3.7% (681)
High School Diploma 11.9% (4,114) 13.5% (2,510)
Less than High School 16.8% (5,808) 17.4% (3,249)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.7% (6,118) 14.4% (2,680)

Education Levels Comparison: Mcminnville vs Siloam springs

  • In Siloam springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 1.4% in Mcminnville.
  • In Siloam springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.5% compared to 11.9% in Mcminnville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Siloam springs at 17.4%, compared to 16.8% in Mcminnville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mcminnville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.7% compared to 14.4% in Siloam springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.