Demographics details for Mcminnville, OR vs Picayune, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcminnville, OR vs Picayune, MS.
| Data | Mcminnville | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,530 | 11,826 |
| Median Age | 40.1 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $65,318 | $35,649 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Mcminnville vs Picayune
- In Mcminnville, the population is higher at 34,530, compared to 11,826 in Picayune.
- Residents in Mcminnville have a higher median age of 40.1 years compared to 38.3 years in Picayune.
- Mcminnville has a higher median income of $65,318 compared to $35,649 in Picayune.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mcminnville at 35.0% compared to 27.0% in Picayune.
- The poverty level is higher in Picayune at 21%, compared to 10% in Mcminnville.
- Picayune has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.9% in Mcminnville.
Demographics
Demographics Mcminnville vs Picayune provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mcminnville | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 38 |
| White | 67 | 55 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 18 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mcminnville vs Picayune
- In Picayune, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 0% in Mcminnville.
- Mcminnville has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 55% in Picayune.
- The Asian population is larger in Mcminnville at 2% compared to 0% in Picayune.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mcminnville at 18% compared to 2% in Picayune.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mcminnville at 12% compared to 5% in Picayune.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Mcminnville at 1% compared to 0% in Picayune.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mcminnville | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 27.2% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 15.6% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 13.3% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | 44.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcminnville vs Picayune
- In Picayune, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 18.3% in Mcminnville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mcminnville at 27.2% compared to 24.0% in Picayune.
- Picayune has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 15.6% in Mcminnville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mcminnville at 17.6% compared to 13.3% in Picayune.
- Picayune has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 35.1% in Mcminnville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Picayune at 21.0% compared to 17.0% in Mcminnville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mcminnville | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (472) | 0.6% (73) |
| High School Diploma | 11.9% (4,114) | 17.8% (2,108) |
| Less than High School | 16.8% (5,808) | 11.8% (1,392) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.7% (6,118) | 10.1% (1,200) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcminnville vs Picayune
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcminnville have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.6% in Picayune.
- In Picayune, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 11.9% in Mcminnville.
- More residents in Mcminnville have less than a high school education at 16.8% compared to 11.8% in Picayune.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcminnville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.7% compared to 10.1% in Picayune.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.