Demographics details for Mcminnville, OR vs Irving, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcminnville, OR vs Irving, IL.
| Data | Mcminnville | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,530 | 370 |
| Median Age | 40.1 years | 42.1 years |
| Median Income | $65,318 | $50,000 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Mcminnville vs Irving
- In Mcminnville, the population is higher at 34,530, compared to 370 in Irving.
- The median age in Irving is higher at 42.1 years, compared to 40.1 years in Mcminnville.
- Mcminnville has a higher median income of $65,318 compared to $50,000 in Irving.
- In Irving, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 35.0% in Mcminnville.
- The poverty level is identical in both Mcminnville and Irving at 10%.
- Irving has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.9% in Mcminnville.
Demographics
Demographics Mcminnville vs Irving provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mcminnville | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 67 | 91 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 18 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mcminnville vs Irving
- In Irving, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Mcminnville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Irving at 91% compared to 67% in Mcminnville.
- The Asian population is larger in Mcminnville at 2% compared to 0% in Irving.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mcminnville at 18% compared to 4% in Irving.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mcminnville at 12% compared to 4% in Irving.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Mcminnville at 1% compared to 0% in Irving.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mcminnville | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 27.2% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 15.6% | 22.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcminnville vs Irving
- In Irving, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 18.3% in Mcminnville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mcminnville at 27.2% compared to 24.0% in Irving.
- Irving has a higher smoking rate at 22.1% compared to 15.6% in Mcminnville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mcminnville at 17.6% compared to 17.3% in Irving.
- Irving has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 35.1% in Mcminnville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Irving at 20.0% compared to 17.0% in Mcminnville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mcminnville | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (472) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 11.9% (4,114) | 24.9% (92) |
| Less than High School | 16.8% (5,808) | 20.5% (76) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.7% (6,118) | 9.2% (34) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcminnville vs Irving
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcminnville have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Irving.
- In Irving, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.9% compared to 11.9% in Mcminnville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Irving at 20.5%, compared to 16.8% in Mcminnville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcminnville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.7% compared to 9.2% in Irving.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.