Environment details: Mcminnville OR
Good quality, maintained conditions.
Environment details: Bluefield WV
Poor quality; significant contamination detected.
Compare Environment: Mcminnville OR vs Bluefield WV
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Mcminnville | Bluefield |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 308 | 707 |
| Water Quality | 7/10 | 3/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Good quality, maintained conditions. | Poor quality; significant contamination detected. |
| Median Air Quality | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.5 | 1.63 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 16 | 19 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Mcminnville vs Bluefield
- Water quality is rated higher in Mcminnville at 7/10 compared to 3/10 in Bluefield.
- Bluefield has a better median air quality index at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Mcminnville.
- Air quality is better in Bluefield with an average index of 1.63 compared to 1.5 in Mcminnville.
- Bluefield experiences more days with poor air quality at 19 compared to 16 in Mcminnville.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.