Demographics details for Mcminnville, OR vs Beacon, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcminnville, OR vs Beacon, IA.
| Data | Mcminnville | Beacon |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,530 | 430 |
| Median Age | 40.1 years | 39.6 years |
| Median Income | $65,318 | $54,250 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Mcminnville vs Beacon
- In Mcminnville, the population is higher at 34,530, compared to 430 in Beacon.
- Residents in Mcminnville have a higher median age of 40.1 years compared to 39.6 years in Beacon.
- Mcminnville has a higher median income of $65,318 compared to $54,250 in Beacon.
- In Beacon, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 35.0% in Mcminnville.
- Mcminnville has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Beacon.
- The unemployment rate in Mcminnville is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.5% in Beacon.
Demographics
Demographics Mcminnville vs Beacon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mcminnville | Beacon |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 67 | 88 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 18 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mcminnville vs Beacon
- In Beacon, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Mcminnville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Beacon at 88% compared to 67% in Mcminnville.
- In Beacon, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Mcminnville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mcminnville at 18% compared to 0% in Beacon.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mcminnville at 12% compared to 6% in Beacon.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Mcminnville at 1% compared to 0% in Beacon.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mcminnville | Beacon |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 27.2% | 18.4% |
| Smoking | 15.6% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 21.4% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | 38.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcminnville vs Beacon
- More residents in Mcminnville report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.4% in Beacon.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mcminnville at 27.2% compared to 18.4% in Beacon.
- Beacon has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 15.6% in Mcminnville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Beacon at 21.4% compared to 17.6% in Mcminnville.
- Beacon has higher obesity rates at 38.1% compared to 35.1% in Mcminnville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mcminnville at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Beacon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mcminnville | Beacon |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (472) | 0.2% (1) |
| High School Diploma | 11.9% (4,114) | 26.3% (113) |
| Less than High School | 16.8% (5,808) | 18.4% (79) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.7% (6,118) | 6.0% (26) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcminnville vs Beacon
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcminnville have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.2% in Beacon.
- In Beacon, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.3% compared to 11.9% in Mcminnville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Beacon at 18.4%, compared to 16.8% in Mcminnville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcminnville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.7% compared to 6.0% in Beacon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.