Demographics details for Mckinney, TX vs Sanger, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mckinney, TX vs Sanger, CA.
Data | Mckinney | Sanger |
---|---|---|
Population | 207,507 | 26,600 |
Median Age | 36.9 years | 31.8 years |
Median Income | $113,286 | $69,333 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 8.2 |
Population Comparison: Mckinney vs Sanger
- In Mckinney, the population is higher at 207,507, compared to 26,600 in Sanger.
- Residents in Mckinney have a higher median age of 36.9 years compared to 31.8 years in Sanger.
- Mckinney has a higher median income of $113,286 compared to $69,333 in Sanger.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mckinney at 43.0% compared to 34.0% in Sanger.
- The poverty level is higher in Sanger at 16%, compared to 9% in Mckinney.
- Sanger has a higher unemployment rate at 8.2% compared to 4.4% in Mckinney.
Demographics
Demographics Mckinney vs Sanger provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mckinney | Sanger |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | Data is updating |
White | 52 | 3 |
Asian | 11 | 3 |
Hispanic | 16 | 77 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 15 |
American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Mckinney vs Sanger
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mckinney at 11% compared to 0% in Sanger.
- Mckinney has a higher percentage of White residents at 52% compared to 3% in Sanger.
- The Asian population is larger in Mckinney at 11% compared to 3% in Sanger.
- Sanger has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 77%, compared to 16% in Mckinney.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sanger at 15%, compared to 9% in Mckinney.
- In Sanger, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Mckinney.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mckinney | Sanger |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 17.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 14.7% |
Depression | 22.1% | 17.2% |
Smoking | 12.2% | 14.7% |
Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 13.8% |
Obesity | 29.3% | 40.2% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mckinney vs Sanger
- In Sanger, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 15.0% in Mckinney.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mckinney at 22.1% compared to 17.2% in Sanger.
- Sanger has a higher smoking rate at 14.7% compared to 12.2% in Mckinney.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mckinney at 18.0% compared to 13.8% in Sanger.
- Sanger has higher obesity rates at 40.2% compared to 29.3% in Mckinney.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sanger at 11.0% compared to 6.0% in Mckinney.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mckinney | Sanger |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (916) | 2.9% (768) |
High School Diploma | 8.2% (16,929) | 13.5% (3,599) |
Less than High School | 5.5% (11,513) | 32.2% (8,575) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.6% (65,610) | 7.8% (2,067) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mckinney vs Sanger
- In Sanger, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 0.4% in Mckinney.
- In Sanger, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.5% compared to 8.2% in Mckinney.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sanger at 32.2%, compared to 5.5% in Mckinney.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mckinney hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.6% compared to 7.8% in Sanger.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.