Demographics details for Mckinney, TX vs Draper, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mckinney, TX vs Draper, UT.
| Data | Mckinney | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 207,507 | 50,731 |
| Median Age | 36.9 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $113,286 | $126,041 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Mckinney vs Draper
- In Mckinney, the population is higher at 207,507, compared to 50,731 in Draper.
- Residents in Mckinney have a higher median age of 36.9 years compared to 33.6 years in Draper.
- Draper has a higher median income of $126,041, compared to $113,286 in Mckinney.
- In Draper, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 43.0% in Mckinney.
- Mckinney has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Draper.
- The unemployment rate in Mckinney is higher at 4.4%, compared to 4.0% in Draper.
Demographics
Demographics Mckinney vs Draper provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mckinney | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 2 |
| White | 52 | 81 |
| Asian | 11 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mckinney vs Draper
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mckinney at 11% compared to 2% in Draper.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Draper at 81% compared to 52% in Mckinney.
- The Asian population is larger in Mckinney at 11% compared to 4% in Draper.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mckinney at 16% compared to 7% in Draper.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mckinney at 9% compared to 6% in Draper.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Mckinney at 1% compared to 0% in Draper.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mckinney | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 22.1% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 12.2% | 7.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 29.3% | 28.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mckinney vs Draper
- In Draper, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Mckinney.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Draper at 25.3% versus 22.1% in Mckinney.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mckinney at 12.2% compared to 7.1% in Draper.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mckinney at 18.0% compared to 16.7% in Draper.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mckinney at 29.3% compared to 28.2% in Draper.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Mckinney and Draper at 6.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mckinney | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (916) | 0.7% (347) |
| High School Diploma | 8.2% (16,929) | 7.4% (3,771) |
| Less than High School | 5.5% (11,513) | 4.1% (2,077) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.6% (65,610) | 30.1% (15,258) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mckinney vs Draper
- In Draper, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Mckinney.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mckinney hold a high school diploma at 8.2% compared to 7.4% in Draper.
- More residents in Mckinney have less than a high school education at 5.5% compared to 4.1% in Draper.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mckinney hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.6% compared to 30.1% in Draper.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.