Demographics details for Mcdonough, GA vs Woodland, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcdonough, GA vs Woodland, CA.
| Data | Mcdonough | Woodland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,340 | 61,462 |
| Median Age | 31.0 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $77,804 | $84,494 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.9 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: Mcdonough vs Woodland
- The population in Woodland is higher at 61,462, compared to 30,340 in Mcdonough.
- The median age in Woodland is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 31.0 years in Mcdonough.
- Woodland has a higher median income of $84,494, compared to $77,804 in Mcdonough.
- In Woodland, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 31.0% in Mcdonough.
- Mcdonough has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Woodland.
- Woodland has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 5.9% in Mcdonough.
Demographics
Demographics Mcdonough vs Woodland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mcdonough | Woodland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 70 | 2 |
| White | 14 | 21 |
| Asian | 2 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 49 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 20 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Mcdonough vs Woodland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mcdonough at 70% compared to 2% in Woodland.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodland at 21% compared to 14% in Mcdonough.
- In Woodland, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 2% in Mcdonough.
- Woodland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 49%, compared to 6% in Mcdonough.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodland at 20%, compared to 8% in Mcdonough.
- In Woodland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mcdonough.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mcdonough | Woodland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 19.6% | 18.8% |
| Smoking | 16.1% | 12.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 28.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcdonough vs Woodland
- More residents in Mcdonough report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 16.0% in Woodland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mcdonough at 19.6% compared to 18.8% in Woodland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mcdonough at 16.1% compared to 12.2% in Woodland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Woodland at 16.4% compared to 15.1% in Mcdonough.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mcdonough at 39.5% compared to 28.9% in Woodland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodland at 12.0% compared to 7.0% in Mcdonough.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mcdonough | Woodland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (221) | 2.0% (1,223) |
| High School Diploma | 14.8% (4,501) | 13.9% (8,533) |
| Less than High School | 4.9% (1,500) | 22.2% (13,649) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.1% (4,882) | 19.0% (11,706) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcdonough vs Woodland
- In Woodland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.7% in Mcdonough.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcdonough hold a high school diploma at 14.8% compared to 13.9% in Woodland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodland at 22.2%, compared to 4.9% in Mcdonough.
- In Woodland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.0% compared to 16.1% in Mcdonough.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.