Demographics details for Mcdonough, GA vs Ute, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcdonough, GA vs Ute, IA.
| Data | Mcdonough | Ute |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,340 | 329 |
| Median Age | 31.0 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $77,804 | $51,250 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.9 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Mcdonough vs Ute
- In Mcdonough, the population is higher at 30,340, compared to 329 in Ute.
- The median age in Ute is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 31.0 years in Mcdonough.
- Mcdonough has a higher median income of $77,804 compared to $51,250 in Ute.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mcdonough at 31.0% compared to 27.0% in Ute.
- Mcdonough has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Ute.
- The unemployment rate in Mcdonough is higher at 5.9%, compared to 2.2% in Ute.
Demographics
Demographics Mcdonough vs Ute provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mcdonough | Ute |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 70 | Data is updating |
| White | 14 | 99 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mcdonough vs Ute
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mcdonough at 70% compared to 0% in Ute.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ute at 99% compared to 14% in Mcdonough.
- The Asian population is larger in Mcdonough at 2% compared to 0% in Ute.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mcdonough at 6% compared to 1% in Ute.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mcdonough at 8% compared to 0% in Ute.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mcdonough and Ute at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mcdonough | Ute |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 19.6% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 16.1% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 21.4% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 40.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcdonough vs Ute
- More residents in Mcdonough report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 16.3% in Ute.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ute at 19.9% versus 19.6% in Mcdonough.
- Ute has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 16.1% in Mcdonough.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ute at 21.4% compared to 15.1% in Mcdonough.
- Ute has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 39.5% in Mcdonough.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ute at 24.0% compared to 7.0% in Mcdonough.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mcdonough | Ute |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (221) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.8% (4,501) | 31.0% (102) |
| Less than High School | 4.9% (1,500) | 8.5% (28) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.1% (4,882) | 7.0% (23) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcdonough vs Ute
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcdonough have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Ute.
- In Ute, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.0% compared to 14.8% in Mcdonough.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ute at 8.5%, compared to 4.9% in Mcdonough.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcdonough hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.1% compared to 7.0% in Ute.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.