Demographics details for Mcdonough, GA vs Thompsons station, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mcdonough, GA vs Thompsons station, TN.

Data Mcdonough Thompsons station
Population 30,340 8,199
Median Age 31.0 years 36.1 years
Median Income $77,804 $116,569
Married Families 31.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 13% 3%
Unemployment Rate 5.9 2.6

Population Comparison: Mcdonough vs Thompsons station

  • In Mcdonough, the population is higher at 30,340, compared to 8,199 in Thompsons station.
  • The median age in Thompsons station is higher at 36.1 years, compared to 31.0 years in Mcdonough.
  • Thompsons station has a higher median income of $116,569, compared to $77,804 in Mcdonough.
  • In Thompsons station, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 31.0% in Mcdonough.
  • Mcdonough has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 3% in Thompsons station.
  • The unemployment rate in Mcdonough is higher at 5.9%, compared to 2.6% in Thompsons station.

Demographics

Demographics Mcdonough vs Thompsons station provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mcdonough Thompsons station
Black 70 2
White 14 84
Asian 2 4
Hispanic 6 1
Two or More Races 8 11
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Mcdonough vs Thompsons station

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mcdonough at 70% compared to 2% in Thompsons station.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Thompsons station at 84% compared to 14% in Mcdonough.
  • In Thompsons station, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Mcdonough.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Mcdonough at 6% compared to 1% in Thompsons station.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Thompsons station at 11%, compared to 8% in Mcdonough.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mcdonough and Thompsons station at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mcdonough Thompsons station
Mental Health Not Good 16.4% 15.1%
Physical Health Not Good 11.6% 9.3%
Depression 19.6% 24.3%
Smoking 16.1% 13.5%
Binge Drinking 15.1% 17.0%
Obesity 39.5% 29.2%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 5.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mcdonough vs Thompsons station

  • More residents in Mcdonough report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 15.1% in Thompsons station.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Thompsons station at 24.3% versus 19.6% in Mcdonough.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mcdonough at 16.1% compared to 13.5% in Thompsons station.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Thompsons station at 17.0% compared to 15.1% in Mcdonough.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mcdonough at 39.5% compared to 29.2% in Thompsons station.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mcdonough at 7.0% compared to 5.0% in Thompsons station.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mcdonough Thompsons station
No Schooling 0.7% (221) 0.6% (51)
High School Diploma 14.8% (4,501) 11.2% (920)
Less than High School 4.9% (1,500) 4.1% (340)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.1% (4,882) 33.2% (2,725)

Education Levels Comparison: Mcdonough vs Thompsons station

  • A higher percentage of residents in Mcdonough have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Thompsons station.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mcdonough hold a high school diploma at 14.8% compared to 11.2% in Thompsons station.
  • More residents in Mcdonough have less than a high school education at 4.9% compared to 4.1% in Thompsons station.
  • In Thompsons station, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.2% compared to 16.1% in Mcdonough.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.