Demographics details for Mcdonough, GA vs Forest lake, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcdonough, GA vs Forest lake, MN.
| Data | Mcdonough | Forest lake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,340 | 20,857 |
| Median Age | 31.0 years | 37.9 years |
| Median Income | $77,804 | $91,157 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.9 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Mcdonough vs Forest lake
- In Mcdonough, the population is higher at 30,340, compared to 20,857 in Forest lake.
- The median age in Forest lake is higher at 37.9 years, compared to 31.0 years in Mcdonough.
- Forest lake has a higher median income of $91,157, compared to $77,804 in Mcdonough.
- In Forest lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 31.0% in Mcdonough.
- Mcdonough has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- The unemployment rate in Mcdonough is higher at 5.9%, compared to 3.2% in Forest lake.
Demographics
Demographics Mcdonough vs Forest lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mcdonough | Forest lake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 70 | 3 |
| White | 14 | 81 |
| Asian | 2 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mcdonough vs Forest lake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mcdonough at 70% compared to 3% in Forest lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Forest lake at 81% compared to 14% in Mcdonough.
- In Forest lake, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Mcdonough.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Mcdonough and Forest lake at 6%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mcdonough at 8% compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mcdonough and Forest lake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mcdonough | Forest lake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 19.6% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 16.1% | 15.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 21.4% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcdonough vs Forest lake
- More residents in Mcdonough report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 14.7% in Forest lake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Forest lake at 24.1% versus 19.6% in Mcdonough.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mcdonough at 16.1% compared to 15.7% in Forest lake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Forest lake at 21.4% compared to 15.1% in Mcdonough.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mcdonough at 39.5% compared to 32.9% in Forest lake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Forest lake at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Mcdonough.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mcdonough | Forest lake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (221) | 0.5% (101) |
| High School Diploma | 14.8% (4,501) | 14.6% (3,055) |
| Less than High School | 4.9% (1,500) | 7.7% (1,615) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.1% (4,882) | 24.6% (5,123) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcdonough vs Forest lake
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcdonough have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Forest lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcdonough hold a high school diploma at 14.8% compared to 14.6% in Forest lake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Forest lake at 7.7%, compared to 4.9% in Mcdonough.
- In Forest lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.6% compared to 16.1% in Mcdonough.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.