Demographics details for Mcdonough, GA vs Eufaula, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcdonough, GA vs Eufaula, OK.
Data | Mcdonough | Eufaula |
---|---|---|
Population | 30,340 | 2,805 |
Median Age | 31.0 years | 47.7 years |
Median Income | $77,804 | $38,774 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 26.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.9 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Mcdonough vs Eufaula
- In Mcdonough, the population is higher at 30,340, compared to 2,805 in Eufaula.
- The median age in Eufaula is higher at 47.7 years, compared to 31.0 years in Mcdonough.
- Mcdonough has a higher median income of $77,804 compared to $38,774 in Eufaula.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mcdonough at 31.0% compared to 26.0% in Eufaula.
- The poverty level is higher in Eufaula at 15%, compared to 13% in Mcdonough.
- The unemployment rate in Mcdonough is higher at 5.9%, compared to 3.2% in Eufaula.
Demographics
Demographics Mcdonough vs Eufaula provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mcdonough | Eufaula |
---|---|---|
Black | 70 | 5 |
White | 14 | 70 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 6 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 8 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 13 |
Demographics Comparison: Mcdonough vs Eufaula
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mcdonough at 70% compared to 5% in Eufaula.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Eufaula at 70% compared to 14% in Mcdonough.
- The Asian population is larger in Mcdonough at 2% compared to 1% in Eufaula.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mcdonough at 6% compared to 0% in Eufaula.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Eufaula at 11%, compared to 8% in Mcdonough.
- In Eufaula, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 13%, compared to 0% in Mcdonough.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mcdonough | Eufaula |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 21.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 16.1% |
Depression | 19.6% | 26.7% |
Smoking | 16.1% | 26.9% |
Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 13.1% |
Obesity | 39.5% | 45.3% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcdonough vs Eufaula
- In Eufaula, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.4% compared to 16.4% in Mcdonough.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Eufaula at 26.7% versus 19.6% in Mcdonough.
- Eufaula has a higher smoking rate at 26.9% compared to 16.1% in Mcdonough.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mcdonough at 15.1% compared to 13.1% in Eufaula.
- Eufaula has higher obesity rates at 45.3% compared to 39.5% in Mcdonough.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Eufaula at 24.0% compared to 7.0% in Mcdonough.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mcdonough | Eufaula |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (221) | 0.0% (1) |
High School Diploma | 14.8% (4,501) | 21.7% (608) |
Less than High School | 4.9% (1,500) | 22.1% (620) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.1% (4,882) | 7.6% (213) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcdonough vs Eufaula
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcdonough have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Eufaula.
- In Eufaula, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 14.8% in Mcdonough.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Eufaula at 22.1%, compared to 4.9% in Mcdonough.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcdonough hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.1% compared to 7.6% in Eufaula.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.