Demographics details for Mcdonough, GA vs Colorado springs, CO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mcdonough, GA vs Colorado springs, CO.

Data Mcdonough Colorado springs
Population 30,340 486,248
Median Age 31.0 years 35.1 years
Median Income $77,804 $79,026
Married Families 31.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 13% 11%
Unemployment Rate 5.9 4.0

Population Comparison: Mcdonough vs Colorado springs

  • The population in Colorado springs is higher at 486,248, compared to 30,340 in Mcdonough.
  • The median age in Colorado springs is higher at 35.1 years, compared to 31.0 years in Mcdonough.
  • Colorado springs has a higher median income of $79,026, compared to $77,804 in Mcdonough.
  • In Colorado springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 31.0% in Mcdonough.
  • Mcdonough has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 11% in Colorado springs.
  • The unemployment rate in Mcdonough is higher at 5.9%, compared to 4.0% in Colorado springs.

Demographics

Demographics Mcdonough vs Colorado springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mcdonough Colorado springs
Black 70 6
White 14 61
Asian 2 3
Hispanic 6 18
Two or More Races 8 11
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Mcdonough vs Colorado springs

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mcdonough at 70% compared to 6% in Colorado springs.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Colorado springs at 61% compared to 14% in Mcdonough.
  • In Colorado springs, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Mcdonough.
  • Colorado springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 6% in Mcdonough.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Colorado springs at 11%, compared to 8% in Mcdonough.
  • In Colorado springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mcdonough.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mcdonough Colorado springs
Mental Health Not Good 16.4% 16.2%
Physical Health Not Good 11.6% 10.8%
Depression 19.6% 25.4%
Smoking 16.1% 14.5%
Binge Drinking 15.1% 15.8%
Obesity 39.5% 28.4%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mcdonough vs Colorado springs

  • More residents in Mcdonough report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 16.2% in Colorado springs.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Colorado springs at 25.4% versus 19.6% in Mcdonough.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mcdonough at 16.1% compared to 14.5% in Colorado springs.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Colorado springs at 15.8% compared to 15.1% in Mcdonough.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mcdonough at 39.5% compared to 28.4% in Colorado springs.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Colorado springs at 12.0% compared to 7.0% in Mcdonough.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mcdonough Colorado springs
No Schooling 0.7% (221) 0.7% (3,192)
High School Diploma 14.8% (4,501) 10.2% (49,754)
Less than High School 4.9% (1,500) 6.8% (33,298)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.1% (4,882) 27.3% (132,822)

Education Levels Comparison: Mcdonough vs Colorado springs

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Mcdonough and Colorado springs at 0.7%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mcdonough hold a high school diploma at 14.8% compared to 10.2% in Colorado springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Colorado springs at 6.8%, compared to 4.9% in Mcdonough.
  • In Colorado springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.3% compared to 16.1% in Mcdonough.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.