Demographics details for Mcdonough, GA vs College park, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcdonough, GA vs College park, MD.
| Data | Mcdonough | College park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,340 | 34,190 |
| Median Age | 31.0 years | 21.6 years |
| Median Income | $77,804 | $76,973 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 17.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.9 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Mcdonough vs College park
- The population in College park is higher at 34,190, compared to 30,340 in Mcdonough.
- Residents in Mcdonough have a higher median age of 31.0 years compared to 21.6 years in College park.
- Mcdonough has a higher median income of $77,804 compared to $76,973 in College park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mcdonough at 31.0% compared to 17.0% in College park.
- Mcdonough has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in College park.
- The unemployment rate in Mcdonough is higher at 5.9%, compared to 5.5% in College park.
Demographics
Demographics Mcdonough vs College park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mcdonough | College park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 70 | 23 |
| White | 14 | 39 |
| Asian | 2 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mcdonough vs College park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mcdonough at 70% compared to 23% in College park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in College park at 39% compared to 14% in Mcdonough.
- In College park, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 2% in Mcdonough.
- College park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 6% in Mcdonough.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mcdonough at 8% compared to 7% in College park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mcdonough and College park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mcdonough | College park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 14.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 19.6% | 15.4% |
| Smoking | 16.1% | 12.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 12.8% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 36.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcdonough vs College park
- More residents in Mcdonough report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 14.8% in College park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mcdonough at 19.6% compared to 15.4% in College park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mcdonough at 16.1% compared to 12.4% in College park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mcdonough at 15.1% compared to 12.8% in College park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mcdonough at 39.5% compared to 36.4% in College park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mcdonough at 7.0% compared to 5.0% in College park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mcdonough | College park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (221) | 1.9% (657) |
| High School Diploma | 14.8% (4,501) | 6.4% (2,199) |
| Less than High School | 4.9% (1,500) | 9.4% (3,210) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.1% (4,882) | 19.8% (6,769) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcdonough vs College park
- In College park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.7% in Mcdonough.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcdonough hold a high school diploma at 14.8% compared to 6.4% in College park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in College park at 9.4%, compared to 4.9% in Mcdonough.
- In College park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 16.1% in Mcdonough.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.