Demographics details for Mcdonough, GA vs Clarksville, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mcdonough, GA vs Clarksville, TN.

Data Mcdonough Clarksville
Population 30,340 176,974
Median Age 31.0 years 30.1 years
Median Income $77,804 $62,688
Married Families 31.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 13% 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.9 4.3

Population Comparison: Mcdonough vs Clarksville

  • The population in Clarksville is higher at 176,974, compared to 30,340 in Mcdonough.
  • Residents in Mcdonough have a higher median age of 31.0 years compared to 30.1 years in Clarksville.
  • Mcdonough has a higher median income of $77,804 compared to $62,688 in Clarksville.
  • In Clarksville, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 31.0% in Mcdonough.
  • Mcdonough has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Clarksville.
  • The unemployment rate in Mcdonough is higher at 5.9%, compared to 4.3% in Clarksville.

Demographics

Demographics Mcdonough vs Clarksville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mcdonough Clarksville
Black 70 22
White 14 55
Asian 2 3
Hispanic 6 11
Two or More Races 8 9
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Mcdonough vs Clarksville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mcdonough at 70% compared to 22% in Clarksville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Clarksville at 55% compared to 14% in Mcdonough.
  • In Clarksville, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Mcdonough.
  • Clarksville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 6% in Mcdonough.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clarksville at 9%, compared to 8% in Mcdonough.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mcdonough and Clarksville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mcdonough Clarksville
Mental Health Not Good 16.4% 18.6%
Physical Health Not Good 11.6% 12.6%
Depression 19.6% 28.4%
Smoking 16.1% 20.1%
Binge Drinking 15.1% 14.8%
Obesity 39.5% 39.3%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mcdonough vs Clarksville

  • In Clarksville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 16.4% in Mcdonough.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Clarksville at 28.4% versus 19.6% in Mcdonough.
  • Clarksville has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 16.1% in Mcdonough.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Mcdonough at 15.1% compared to 14.8% in Clarksville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mcdonough at 39.5% compared to 39.3% in Clarksville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clarksville at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Mcdonough.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mcdonough Clarksville
No Schooling 0.7% (221) 0.6% (976)
High School Diploma 14.8% (4,501) 13.7% (24,180)
Less than High School 4.9% (1,500) 5.5% (9,720)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.1% (4,882) 16.7% (29,557)

Education Levels Comparison: Mcdonough vs Clarksville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Mcdonough have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Clarksville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mcdonough hold a high school diploma at 14.8% compared to 13.7% in Clarksville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clarksville at 5.5%, compared to 4.9% in Mcdonough.
  • In Clarksville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.7% compared to 16.1% in Mcdonough.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.