Demographics details for Mccurtain, OK vs Riverdale, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mccurtain, OK vs Riverdale, NJ.
| Data | Mccurtain | Riverdale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,931 | 4,105 |
| Median Age | 38.2 years | 49.0 years |
| Median Income | $47,046 | $103,214 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 3% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Mccurtain vs Riverdale
- In Mccurtain, the population is higher at 30,931, compared to 4,105 in Riverdale.
- The median age in Riverdale is higher at 49.0 years, compared to 38.2 years in Mccurtain.
- Riverdale has a higher median income of $103,214, compared to $47,046 in Mccurtain.
- In Riverdale, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 37.0% in Mccurtain.
- Mccurtain has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 3% in Riverdale.
- The unemployment rate in Mccurtain is higher at 4.6%, compared to 4.3% in Riverdale.
Demographics
Demographics Mccurtain vs Riverdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mccurtain | Riverdale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 2 |
| White | 58 | 70 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 9 |
| American Indian | 14 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mccurtain vs Riverdale
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mccurtain at 8% compared to 2% in Riverdale.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Riverdale at 70% compared to 58% in Mccurtain.
- In Riverdale, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Mccurtain.
- Riverdale has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 7% in Mccurtain.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mccurtain at 12% compared to 9% in Riverdale.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Mccurtain at 14% compared to 0% in Riverdale.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mccurtain | Riverdale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.9% | 13.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.2% | 8.6% |
| Depression | 26.9% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 25.0% | 11.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 46.9% | 25.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mccurtain vs Riverdale
- More residents in Mccurtain report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 13.9% in Riverdale.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mccurtain at 26.9% compared to 19.7% in Riverdale.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mccurtain at 25.0% compared to 11.8% in Riverdale.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Riverdale at 19.8% compared to 13.7% in Mccurtain.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mccurtain at 46.9% compared to 25.2% in Riverdale.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mccurtain at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in Riverdale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mccurtain | Riverdale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (209) | 0.1% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 23.5% (7,268) | 20.9% (856) |
| Less than High School | 17.2% (5,334) | 4.0% (166) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.3% (3,200) | 33.0% (1,354) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mccurtain vs Riverdale
- A higher percentage of residents in Mccurtain have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.1% in Riverdale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mccurtain hold a high school diploma at 23.5% compared to 20.9% in Riverdale.
- More residents in Mccurtain have less than a high school education at 17.2% compared to 4.0% in Riverdale.
- In Riverdale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.0% compared to 10.3% in Mccurtain.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.