Demographics details for Mccurtain, OK vs Baldwin park, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mccurtain, OK vs Baldwin park, CA.
Data | Mccurtain | Baldwin park |
---|---|---|
Population | 30,931 | 69,455 |
Median Age | 38.2 years | 37.1 years |
Median Income | $47,046 | $76,002 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 6.3 |
Population Comparison: Mccurtain vs Baldwin park
- The population in Baldwin park is higher at 69,455, compared to 30,931 in Mccurtain.
- Residents in Mccurtain have a higher median age of 38.2 years compared to 37.1 years in Baldwin park.
- Baldwin park has a higher median income of $76,002, compared to $47,046 in Mccurtain.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Mccurtain and Baldwin park at 37.0%.
- The poverty level is identical in both Mccurtain and Baldwin park at 12%.
- Baldwin park has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 4.6% in Mccurtain.
Demographics
Demographics Mccurtain vs Baldwin park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mccurtain | Baldwin park |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 1 |
White | 58 | -25 |
Asian | 1 | 23 |
Hispanic | 7 | 75 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 23 |
American Indian | 14 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Mccurtain vs Baldwin park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mccurtain at 8% compared to 1% in Baldwin park.
- Mccurtain has a higher percentage of White residents at 58% compared to -25% in Baldwin park.
- In Baldwin park, the Asian population stands at 23%, greater than 1% in Mccurtain.
- Baldwin park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 7% in Mccurtain.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Baldwin park at 23%, compared to 12% in Mccurtain.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Mccurtain at 14% compared to 3% in Baldwin park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mccurtain | Baldwin park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.9% | 15.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.2% | 12.7% |
Depression | 26.9% | 14.7% |
Smoking | 25.0% | 11.4% |
Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 14.2% |
Obesity | 46.9% | 29.9% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mccurtain vs Baldwin park
- More residents in Mccurtain report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 15.4% in Baldwin park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mccurtain at 26.9% compared to 14.7% in Baldwin park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mccurtain at 25.0% compared to 11.4% in Baldwin park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Baldwin park at 14.2% compared to 13.7% in Mccurtain.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mccurtain at 46.9% compared to 29.9% in Baldwin park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mccurtain at 21.0% compared to 10.0% in Baldwin park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mccurtain | Baldwin park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (209) | 5.5% (3,853) |
High School Diploma | 23.5% (7,268) | 18.1% (12,587) |
Less than High School | 17.2% (5,334) | 41.7% (28,939) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.3% (3,200) | 9.8% (6,787) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mccurtain vs Baldwin park
- In Baldwin park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 0.7% in Mccurtain.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mccurtain hold a high school diploma at 23.5% compared to 18.1% in Baldwin park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Baldwin park at 41.7%, compared to 17.2% in Mccurtain.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mccurtain hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.3% compared to 9.8% in Baldwin park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.