Demographics details for Mccomb, MS vs Texarkana, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mccomb, MS vs Texarkana, TX.
| Data | Mccomb | Texarkana |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,041 | 35,778 |
| Median Age | 36.8 years | 37.2 years |
| Median Income | $37,288 | $48,054 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Mccomb vs Texarkana
- The population in Texarkana is higher at 35,778, compared to 12,041 in Mccomb.
- The median age in Texarkana is higher at 37.2 years, compared to 36.8 years in Mccomb.
- Texarkana has a higher median income of $48,054, compared to $37,288 in Mccomb.
- In Texarkana, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 23.0% in Mccomb.
- Mccomb has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 15% in Texarkana.
- The unemployment rate in Mccomb is higher at 6.2%, compared to 5.0% in Texarkana.
Demographics
Demographics Mccomb vs Texarkana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mccomb | Texarkana |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 75 | 39 |
| White | 22 | 46 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mccomb vs Texarkana
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mccomb at 75% compared to 39% in Texarkana.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Texarkana at 46% compared to 22% in Mccomb.
- In Texarkana, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Mccomb.
- Texarkana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 2% in Mccomb.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Texarkana at 4%, compared to 1% in Mccomb.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mccomb and Texarkana at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mccomb | Texarkana |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.2% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 25.9% | 21.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 10.8% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 48.5% | 42.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mccomb vs Texarkana
- More residents in Mccomb report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 19.6% in Texarkana.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mccomb at 24.3% compared to 23.4% in Texarkana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mccomb at 25.9% compared to 21.5% in Texarkana.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Texarkana at 16.0% compared to 10.8% in Mccomb.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mccomb at 48.5% compared to 42.0% in Texarkana.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mccomb at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in Texarkana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mccomb | Texarkana |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (81) | 0.9% (324) |
| High School Diploma | 22.1% (2,666) | 17.6% (6,286) |
| Less than High School | 11.2% (1,349) | 11.9% (4,243) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (1,460) | 15.9% (5,688) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mccomb vs Texarkana
- In Texarkana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Mccomb.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mccomb hold a high school diploma at 22.1% compared to 17.6% in Texarkana.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Texarkana at 11.9%, compared to 11.2% in Mccomb.
- In Texarkana, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.9% compared to 12.1% in Mccomb.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.