Demographics details for Mccomb, MS vs Linthicum heights, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mccomb, MS vs Linthicum heights, MD.

Data Mccomb Linthicum heights
Population 12,041 10,731
Median Age 36.8 years 38.6 years
Median Income $37,288 $116,250
Married Families 23.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 22% 5%
Unemployment Rate 6.2 3.2

Population Comparison: Mccomb vs Linthicum heights

  • In Mccomb, the population is higher at 12,041, compared to 10,731 in Linthicum heights.
  • The median age in Linthicum heights is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 36.8 years in Mccomb.
  • Linthicum heights has a higher median income of $116,250, compared to $37,288 in Mccomb.
  • In Linthicum heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 23.0% in Mccomb.
  • Mccomb has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 5% in Linthicum heights.
  • The unemployment rate in Mccomb is higher at 6.2%, compared to 3.2% in Linthicum heights.

Demographics

Demographics Mccomb vs Linthicum heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mccomb Linthicum heights
Black 75 6
White 22 82
Asian Data is updating 5
Hispanic 2 3
Two or More Races 1 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Mccomb vs Linthicum heights

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mccomb at 75% compared to 6% in Linthicum heights.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Linthicum heights at 82% compared to 22% in Mccomb.
  • In Linthicum heights, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Mccomb.
  • Linthicum heights has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Mccomb.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Linthicum heights at 4%, compared to 1% in Mccomb.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mccomb and Linthicum heights at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mccomb Linthicum heights
Mental Health Not Good 20.3% 14.6%
Physical Health Not Good 16.2% 8.6%
Depression 24.3% 20.8%
Smoking 25.9% 11.9%
Binge Drinking 10.8% 18.0%
Obesity 48.5% 33.7%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mccomb vs Linthicum heights

  • More residents in Mccomb report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 14.6% in Linthicum heights.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mccomb at 24.3% compared to 20.8% in Linthicum heights.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mccomb at 25.9% compared to 11.9% in Linthicum heights.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Linthicum heights at 18.0% compared to 10.8% in Mccomb.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mccomb at 48.5% compared to 33.7% in Linthicum heights.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mccomb at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in Linthicum heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mccomb Linthicum heights
No Schooling 0.7% (81) 0.5% (59)
High School Diploma 22.1% (2,666) 13.9% (1,496)
Less than High School 11.2% (1,349) 8.6% (924)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.1% (1,460) 28.8% (3,091)

Education Levels Comparison: Mccomb vs Linthicum heights

  • A higher percentage of residents in Mccomb have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Linthicum heights.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mccomb hold a high school diploma at 22.1% compared to 13.9% in Linthicum heights.
  • More residents in Mccomb have less than a high school education at 11.2% compared to 8.6% in Linthicum heights.
  • In Linthicum heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.8% compared to 12.1% in Mccomb.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.